Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Physiol Behav. 2018 Mar 30;192:82–89. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.03.033

Table 2.

Group differences1 in ideal portion size (Mean kcal ± SEM) selected by children at age 6 years, and differences in measures2 of anthropometry, stratified by EAH intake at ages 4.5 and 6 years.

Ideal portion size (kcal) Age 4.5 years Age 6 years
No EAH EAH No EAH EAH
Bao 231.4 ± 37.3 395.9 ± 31.9*** 266.0 ± 58.8 359.7 ± 28.2
Rice porridge 215.7 ± 36.0 288.6 ± 25.6 224.2 ± 51.5 272.8 ± 22.8
Garlic bread 286.8 ± 42.4 300.0 ± 27.7 277.8 ± 73.2 297.1 ± 24.4
Mac & Cheese 288.8 ± 35.0 379.3 ± 29.6a 407.0 ± 63.7 348.5 ± 25.3
Salad 124.6 ± 25.9 161.9 ± 19.4 123.0 ± 26.0 154.5 ± 17.4
Pizza 325.2 ± 48.4 441.6 ± 31.1* 390. 0 ± 69.9 418.7 ± 28.5
Prata 259.5 ± 29.2 294.7 ± 21.4 275.0 ± 34.6 286.2 ± 19.1
Fried rice 208.4 ± 31.7 302.2 ± 24.9* 268.0 ± 45.2 278.5 ± 22.1
Mean portion 244.0 ± 22.1 329.7 ± 16.8** 275.9 ± 32.6 310.4 ± 15.1

Anthropometry

BMIz 0.18 ± 0.16 0.15 ±0.13 -0.28 ± 0.51 0.08 ± 0.13
Biceps (mm) 7.1 ± 0.2 6.5 ± 0.4 6.1 ± 0.65 6.7 ± 0.28
Triceps (mm) 10.3 ± 0.5 10.3 ± 0.3 9.4 ± 1.1 10.9 ± 0.41
Suprailiac (mm) 6.8 ± 0.5 7.1 ± 0.4 6.4 ± 1.4 7.3 ± 0.49
Subscapular (mm) 7.6 ± 0.6 7.6 ± 0.3 7.8 ± 1.9 8.1 ± 0.5
BAi 31.6 ± 1.9 31.4 ± 1.2 29.3 ± 4.9 33.1 ± 1.6
Mid-arm (cm) 16.6 ± 0.3 17.1 ± 0.4 17.3 ± 0.6 17.8 ± 0.2
Waist (cm) 51.3 ± 0.5 51.8 ± 0.7 53.4 ± 2.0 54.4 ± 0.7
Waist-to-height ratio 0.49 ± 0.01 0.49 ±0.01 0.47 ± 0.01 0.47 ± 0.01

EAH: Eating in the absence of hunger; a=0.051; (t-tests)*p<0.05; **p<0.01, ***p<0.001

1

ANCOVA analyses adjusted for sex and BMI for group differences in ideal portion sizes and adjusted for sex and birth weight in analyses focused on child anthropometry collected at the same time-point as the EAH task.

2

All non-significant