Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 27;13(6):e0195955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195955

Table 1. Adherence to PRISMA checklist of 154 systematic reviews and/or meta-analysis in two groups: With flow diagram and without flow diagram.

Group without flow diagram
(N = 76)
Group with flow diagram
(N = 78)
Description of PRISMA item
TITLE
Title 50 (65.8%) 64 (82.1%)
ABSTRACT
Structured summary 63 (82.9%) 68 (87.2%)
INTRODUCTION
Rationale 75 (98.7%) 78 (100.0%)
Objectives 74 (97.4%) 73 (93.6%)
METHODS
Protocol and registration 5 (6.6%) 6 (7.7%)
Eligibility criteria 70 (92.1%) 77 (98.7%)
Information sources 71 (93.4%) 77 (98.7%)
Search 58 (76.3%) 68 (87.2%)
Study selection 63 (82.9%) 75 (96.2%)
Data collection process 27 (35.5%) 37 (47.4%)
Data items 33 (43.4%) 38 (48.7%)
Risk of bias in individual studies 23 (30.3%) 37 (47.4%)
Summary measures 38 (50.0%) 46 (59.0%)
Synthesis of results 31 (40.8%) 40 (51.3%)
Risk of bias across studies 19 (25.0%) 24 (30.8%)
Additional analyses 23 (30.3%) 23 (29.5%)
RESULTS
Study selection 30 (39.5%) 75 (96.2%)
Study characteristics 50 (65.8%) 72 (92.3%)
Risk of bias within studies 15 (19.7%) 37 (47.4%)
Results of individual studies 39 (51.3%) 61 (78.2%)
Synthesis of results 34 (44.7%) 43 (55.1%)
Risk of bias across studies 20 (26.3%) 25 (32.1%)
Additional analysis 24 (31.6%) 27 (34.6%)
DISCUSSION
Summary of evidence 54 (71.1%) 66 (84.6%)
Limitations 30 (39.5%) 45 (57.7%)
Conclusions 64 (84.2%) 71 (91.0%)
FUNDING
Funding 42 (55.3%) 42 (53.8%)
PrismaTotal 54.8 (19.7) 66.2 (17.6)