Table 1. Adherence to PRISMA checklist of 154 systematic reviews and/or meta-analysis in two groups: With flow diagram and without flow diagram.
Group without flow diagram (N = 76) |
Group with flow diagram (N = 78) |
|
---|---|---|
Description of PRISMA item | ||
TITLE | ||
Title | 50 (65.8%) | 64 (82.1%) |
ABSTRACT | ||
Structured summary | 63 (82.9%) | 68 (87.2%) |
INTRODUCTION | ||
Rationale | 75 (98.7%) | 78 (100.0%) |
Objectives | 74 (97.4%) | 73 (93.6%) |
METHODS | ||
Protocol and registration | 5 (6.6%) | 6 (7.7%) |
Eligibility criteria | 70 (92.1%) | 77 (98.7%) |
Information sources | 71 (93.4%) | 77 (98.7%) |
Search | 58 (76.3%) | 68 (87.2%) |
Study selection | 63 (82.9%) | 75 (96.2%) |
Data collection process | 27 (35.5%) | 37 (47.4%) |
Data items | 33 (43.4%) | 38 (48.7%) |
Risk of bias in individual studies | 23 (30.3%) | 37 (47.4%) |
Summary measures | 38 (50.0%) | 46 (59.0%) |
Synthesis of results | 31 (40.8%) | 40 (51.3%) |
Risk of bias across studies | 19 (25.0%) | 24 (30.8%) |
Additional analyses | 23 (30.3%) | 23 (29.5%) |
RESULTS | ||
Study selection | 30 (39.5%) | 75 (96.2%) |
Study characteristics | 50 (65.8%) | 72 (92.3%) |
Risk of bias within studies | 15 (19.7%) | 37 (47.4%) |
Results of individual studies | 39 (51.3%) | 61 (78.2%) |
Synthesis of results | 34 (44.7%) | 43 (55.1%) |
Risk of bias across studies | 20 (26.3%) | 25 (32.1%) |
Additional analysis | 24 (31.6%) | 27 (34.6%) |
DISCUSSION | ||
Summary of evidence | 54 (71.1%) | 66 (84.6%) |
Limitations | 30 (39.5%) | 45 (57.7%) |
Conclusions | 64 (84.2%) | 71 (91.0%) |
FUNDING | ||
Funding | 42 (55.3%) | 42 (53.8%) |
PrismaTotal | 54.8 (19.7) | 66.2 (17.6) |