Table 1. Comparisons of sleep and sleep-related parameters between HR and LR mattress topper use (study I).
SPT | TST | SL | REM latency | SE1 (TST/SPT) | %stage1 (/TST) | %stage2 (/TST) | %stage34 (/TST) | %stageREM (/TST) | ||||
HR | 470.85±2.50 | 428.60±17.27 | 7.05±2.12 | 75.80±14.43 | 91.01±3.61 | 8.29±0.50 | 56.63±1.81 | 11.32±1.15 | 23.81±2.08 | |||
LR | 470.90±2.61 | 443.00±7.74 | 9.10±2.61 | 93.65±17.73 | 94.11±1.79 | 8.83±0.76 | 52.84±2.41 | 12.65±1.23 | 25.68±2.60 | |||
p-value | 0.84 | 0.64 | 0.46 | 0.07 | 0.81 | 0.64 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.40 | |||
SE2 (TST/TIB) | %stageWAKE (/SPT) | %stage1 (/SPT) | %stage2 (SPT) | %stage34 (/SPT) | %stageREM (/SPT) | arousal index | Roll over during sleep | wake (s) after rolling over | ||||
HR | 89.29±3.60 | 9.45±3.70 | 7.53±0.54 | 51.06±1.43 | 10.24±1.07 | 22.23±2.39 | 4.65±0.64 | 3.00±0.93 | 30.50±7.27 | |||
LR | 92.28±1.62 | 5.88±1.79 | 8.24±0.63 | 49.70±2.28 | 11.81±1.03 | 24.38±2.57 | 4.33±0.38 | 3.60±1.12 | 39.10±13.31 | |||
p-value | 0.60 | 0.14 | 0.31 | 0.94 | 0.12 | 0.43 | 0.70 | 0.26 | 0.77 | |||
VASS | SSS | VASP | SSS2 | VASP2 | GH | LF/HF | ||||||
HR | 7.27±0.60 | 2.60±0.22 | 7.59±0.42 | 1.20±0.13 | 8.97±0.35 | 7.73±1.19 | 5.09±0.16 | |||||
LR | 5.93±0.75 | 2.60±0.16 | 6.51±0.66 | 1.30±0.15 | 8.35±0.63 | 7.25±1.03 | 4.69±0.30 | |||||
p-value | 0.07 | 0.93 | 0.05 | 0.34 | 0.11 | 0.58 | 0.26 | |||||
PVT Mean RT | PVT Median RT | PVT Minimum RT | PVT Maximum RT | Lapses (RT > 500ms) | ||||||||
HR | 235.2±6.4 | 221.6±6.0 | 161.8±5.0 | 512.7±43.0 | 0.60±0.22 | |||||||
LR | 236.8±8.6 | 225.2±8.0 | 163.5±5.4 | 462.6±37.8 | 0.30±0.21 | |||||||
p-value | 0.93 | 0.71 | 0.90 | 0.38 | 0.08 |
SPT, total sleep period (sleep period time); TST, total sleep time; SL, sleep latency; SE1, sleep efficiency; SE2, sleep efficiency; VASS, visual analogue scale sleep; VASP, visual analogue scale performance; SSS, Stanford sleepiness scale; GH, growth hormone; LF, heart rate variability low-frequency; HF, heart rate variability high-frequency; RT, reaction time. Statistical significance was evaluated by paired t-test.