Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2018 Jul;22(7):2056–2067. doi: 10.1007/s10461-018-2100-y

Table 2.

Bivariate Associations between Syndemic Conditions, HIV TRB Events, and Transactional Sex Events (N = 212)

Polydrug Use Depression Childhood
Sexual Abuse
IPV Total
Syndemics
HIV TRB
Eventsa
Transactional
Sex Eventsb

OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) RR (95% CI) RR (95% CI) / r

Polydrug Use --- 1.00 (0.56, 1.78) 0.64 (0.35, 1.15) 2.33* (1.22, 4.47) 3.15*** (2.17, 4.57) 1.79*** (1.30, 2.45) 2.64*** (1.92, 3.63)
Depression --- 1.55 (0.89, 2.70) 1.80 (1.00, 3.25) 4.37*** (2.88, 6.61) 1.25 (0.92, 1.70) 1.34 (0.99, 1.82)
Childhood Sexual Abuse --- 2.38** (1.30, 4.36) 4.01*** (2.69, 5.96) 1.72*** (1.27, 2.33) 0.93 (0.69, 1.27)
IPV --- 9.50*** (5.24, 17.22) 1.66** (1.20, 2.29) 1.67** (1.21, 2.31)
Total Syndemics (0–4) --- 1.36*** (1.58, 2.82) 1.47*** (1.27, 1.72)
HIV TRB Eventsa --- .27***

Note. Associations between the four syndemic conditions were tested using a binary logistic regression, as were their associations with the total syndemics score. Their associations with both outcome variables (i.e., HIV TRB events and transactional sex events) were tested using a negative binomial regression. Spearman’s correlations were computed between the total syndemics score and the two outcomes variables. IPV = Intimate Partner Violence; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; RR = rate ratio;

a

HIV transmission risk behavior events = number of condomless penetrative sex events with a casual or main partner of discordant or unknown HIV status in the past 60 days;

b

Number of oral/anal/vaginal sex events that involved exchange for goods, accommodation, and/or money in the past 60 days;

p < .10;

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001