Table 2.
Control n (%) |
Intervention n (%) |
Absolute difference in proportions, % (95% CI) |
Univariable analysis |
Multivariable analysisb |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | p | OR | 95% CI | p | |||||||
Analysis 1a (N = 68 control and 60 intervention patients) | ||||||||||||
Adherence | 52 | (76.5) | 54 | (90.0) | 13.5 | (7; 26.4) | 2.77 | 1.01–7.62 | 0.043 | 2.77 | 1.01–7.62 | 0.049 |
Non-adherence | 16 | (23.5) | 6 | (10.0) | ||||||||
Analysis 2 (N = 83 control and 71 intervention patients) | ||||||||||||
Adherence | 57 | (68.7) | 59 | (83.1) | 15 | (1.6; 28.4) | 2.32 | 1.00–5.36 | 0.049 | 2.35 | 1.00–5.52 | 0.050 |
Non-adherence | 26 | (31.3) | 12 | (16.9) |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. aSample of Analysis 1 excluding patients who were not measured adherence at 1 month. bUsing multivariable backward stepwise logistic regression models. Variables entered at the first step: intervention status, age, gender, health insurance, education grade ≥6, marital status, number of comorbidities ≥2, type of ACS, BMQ Specific Necessity and Concern scores, and PCI/CABG.