Table 3.
Control n (%) |
Intervention n (%) |
Absolute difference in proportions, % (95% CI) |
Univariable analysis |
Multivariable analysisa |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | p | OR | 95% CI | p | |||||||
Analysis 1 (N = 61 control and 51 intervention patients) | ||||||||||||
Adherence | 47 | (77.0) | 46 | (90.2) | 13.1 | (-5; 26.8) | 2.74 | 0.91–8.23 | 0.065 | 3.68 | 1.14–11.88 | 0.030 |
Non-adherence | 14 | (33.0) | 5 | (9.8) | ||||||||
Analysis 2 (N = 80 control and 70 intervention patients) | ||||||||||||
Adherence | 52 | (65.0) | 53 | (75.7) | 10.1 | (-5.9; 26.0) | 1.71 | 0.81–3.62 | 0.158 | 1.90 | 0.86–4.22 | 0.115 |
Non-adherence | 27 | (35.0) | 17 | (24.3) |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. aUsing multivariable backward stepwise logistic regression models. Variables entered at the first step: intervention status, age, gender, health insurance, education grade ≥ 6, marital status, number of comorbidities ≥ 2, type of ACS, BMQ Specific Necessity and Concern scores, and PCI/CABG.