Table 1.
Study | Type of strategy under investigation | Was the aim to inform an early assessment (i.e., R&D) rather than reimbursement? | Type of parameter(s) elicited |
---|---|---|---|
Garthwaite et al. [14] | Treatment | No | Event probabilities, time to event, dependency |
Leal et al. [10] | Diagnostic/screening | No | Event probabilities, relative effectiveness, diagnostic accuracy |
Girling et al. [15] | Treatment | Yes | Event probabilities, time to event |
Stevenson et al. [16] | Prevents transmission | No | Event probabilities, time to event, relative effectiveness |
Meads et al. [12] | Diagnostic/screening | Yes | Event probabilities, diagnostic accuracy, minimum important clinical difference |
McKenna et al. [19] | Treatment | No | Event probabilities |
Haakma et al. [13] | Diagnostic/screening | Yes | Diagnostic accuracy |
Stevenson et al. [17] | Treatment | No | Event probabilities, relative effectiveness |
Speight et al. [25] | Diagnostic/screening | No | Event probabilities |
Sperber et al. [22] | Treatment | No | Event probabilities, relative effectiveness |
Brodtkorb [26] | Several exercises conducted but insufficient detail reported on each | ||
Colbourn et al. [28] | Diagnostic/screening | No | Event probabilities, relative effectiveness |
Soares et al. [9] | Treatment | No | Event probabilities, relative effectiveness |
Bojke et al. [18] | Treatment | No | Relative effectiveness, dependency |
Cao et al. [11] | Diagnostic/screening | Yes | Relative effectiveness |
Fischer et al. [23] | Treatment | No | Counts, time to event |
Poncet et al. [27] | Diagnostic/screening | No | Event probabilities |
Grigore et al. [24] | Treatment | No | Event probabilities |
Wilson et al. [20] | Treatment | No | Event probabilities, relative effectiveness |
Meeyai et al. [21] | Vaccine | No | Event probabilities |
Grimm et al. [35] | Diagnostic/screening | No | Diffusion† |
R&D, research and development.
Rate of implementation in clinical practice over time.