ABSTRACT
Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) isolates are increasingly migrating from livestock into human and animal health care settings. Alternative substances are needed to overcome the drawbacks of currently available drugs used for MRSA eradication. The recombinant bacteriophage endolysin HY-133 has proved to be an active agent against S. aureus. Here, the in vitro activity of HY-133 was studied against a large collection of genetically diverse LA-MRSA isolates revealing its high activity against mecA-, mecB-, and mecC-positive LA-MRSA.
KEYWORDS: LA-MRSA, Staphylococcus aureus, antimicrobial agents, bacteriophage therapy, endolysin, livestock, susceptibility testing
TEXT
Originally classified as a nosocomial pathogen, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates are increasingly reported as frequent colonizers of animals, mainly of livestock but also of companion animals (1–5). In particular, mecA-based livestock-associated MRSA (LA-MRSA) isolates belonging to clonal complex (CC) 398 have been introduced back into human health care settings during the last decade (3, 6–11). This trend can be observed especially in regions characterized by a high density of livestock industry, such as the border region between Germany and The Netherlands (4, 9, 12–14). Moreover, mecC-based MRSA clonal lineages are widespread among farm, companion, and wildlife animals, and transmission to humans has been described (15–19). Finally, plasmid-borne mecB-mediated methicillin resistance with putative origin from animal-associated Macrococcus species has recently been found in a human MRSA isolate (20).
To contain zoonotic transmission, elimination of MRSA in the animal host is a key approach. However, efficient treatment of animals is challenging due to the wide spread of antibiotic resistance throughout livestock (21–23). The use of phage endolysins is a promising alternative to combat pathogens since, in contrast to conventional antibiotics, phage endolysins profit from high specificity for the target pathogen without affecting the cocolonizing bacterial community and from a low likelihood of inducing bacterial resistance formation (24, 25). HY-133 (HYpharm, Bernried, Germany), a recombinantly produced chimeric endolysin, and its forerunner PRF-119 (Hyglos, Regensburg, Germany) have been shown to efficiently and distinctively impact S. aureus strains (26, 27). Data on their activity against common lineages of LA-MRSA are not available.
In this study, HY-133 was tested on a representative set of diverse LA-MRSA samples comprising mecA- and mecC-carrying MRSA isolates (n = 50 each) and 1 mecB-carrying MRSA isolate belonging to 27 different spa types. Reference groups for evaluation of data from LA-MRSA included non-LA-MRSA and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) isolates (n = 15 each; 19 spa types). LA-MRSA isolates were of human and animal origin from the northwestern part of Germany derived within Dutch-German EUREGIO cross-border research projects (MRSA-net Twente/Münsterland, EurSafety-Health-Net, and SafeGuard MRSA vet-net) (4, 9, 16, 28, 29). Reference groups presented a selection of clinical strains from two German studies covering different spa types (Table 1) (6, 30). In addition, a uniquely reported mecB-positive MRSA isolate was included (20). In vitro activity of HY-133 against S. aureus was evaluated using the broth microdilution method in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines for evaluation of MICs and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs), as previously described (31). In brief, 2-fold dilution series of HY-133 were prepared in cationic adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth medium (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany), with final concentrations ranging from 0.06 to 8 μg/ml. S. aureus strains were inoculated with a final concentration of 5 × 105 CFU/ml. Tests were performed in triplicate, and median values were taken for analysis. S. aureus ATCC 29213 was used as a quality control strain.
TABLE 1.
S. aureus group (no. of isolates) | spa types (no. of isolates) | MIC (μg/ml) |
MBC (μg/ml) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIC50 | MIC90 | Range | MBC50 | MBC90 | Range | ||
LA MRSA, mecC (50) | t843 (20); t1736 (5); t1535 (4); t3391, t6521, t9165, t11706 (2 each); t1738, t1773, t5930, t6220, t6292, t6902, t7914, t8842, t9123, t9738, t11120, t11702, t11290 (1 each) | 0.12 | 1 | ≤0.06–4 | 0.12 | 1 | ≤0.06–4 |
LA MRSA, mecA (50) | t011, t034 (12 each); t108, t1451 (7 each); t571, t6867 (6 each) | 0.25 | 0.5 | ≤0.06–1 | 0.25 | 0.5 | ≤0.06–1 |
MRSA, mecBa (1) | t091 (1) | NCb | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC |
Non-LA-MRSA, mecA (15) | t008 (3); t003, t032, t037, t044 (2 each); t002, t007, t504, t019 (1 each) | 0.5 | 1 | 0.12–1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.12–1 |
MSSA (15) | t008 (3); t002 (2); t211, t021, t034, t076, t337, t352, t364, t529, t1029, t2927 (1 each) | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.12–1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.12–1 |
Total (131) | 0.25 | 0.5 | ≤0.06–4 | 0.25 | 0.5 | ≤0.06–4 |
MIC and MBC, 0.5 μg/ml each; putative livestock origin of the mecB-carrying plasmid (73.3% nucleotide identity with a plasmid of Macrococcus caseolyticus [20], a species colonizing animal skin and recovered from food).
NC, not calculable.
The isolates tested showed MICs and MBCs between 0.06 and 4 μg/ml. The MIC50 was 0.25 μg/ml, and the MIC90 was 0.5 μg/ml. Within each group of LA-MRSA isolates, values for MIC and MBC were identical. Comparison between the groups of LA-MRSA isolates showed a slightly wider range of HY-133 MICs and MBCs against mecC-carrying LA-MRSA (0.12 to 4 μg/ml) than against mecA-carrying LA-MRSA (≤0.06 to 1 μg/ml). For the mecB-positive MRSA isolate, median MIC and MBC values were 0.5 μg/ml. Comparison against values obtained from the groups of non-LA-MRSA and MSSA isolates (both 0.12 to 1 μg/ml) altogether showed similar MIC and MBC ranges (Table 1). Across the complete group of strains tested (n = 131), four strains (3.1%) showed MBC values different from the corresponding MICs, with an MBC:MIC ratio of 2 in all cases. However, phenotypic antimicrobial tolerance defined by an MBC:MIC ratio of ≥32 was excluded for all strains (32, 33).
The wide spread of antibiotic resistance in pathogenic bacterial strains calls for alternative MRSA prevention measures and treatment strategies for human and animal patients. However, conservative phage therapy brings with it several drawbacks, including the potential for horizontal gene transfer of virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes but also bacterial resistance mechanisms, such as attachment inhibition, injection blocking of phage DNA, restriction modification, or phage abortive infection (34–38). In Gram-positive bacteria, purified phage-derived enzymes can be applied exogenously, leading to rapid cell lysis and death (39), presenting a clear advantage over whole-phage application. Phage endolysins have the potential for future use as alternative antibacterials to reduce the resistance selection pressure caused by classic antibiotics. For example, their application may overcome the drawbacks of topical mupirocin administration used for nasal MRSA decolonization characterized by a slow bacteriostatic mode of action that requires several treatment courses and triggers resistance development. Even in the presence of sublethal levels of endolysins, an event of resistance formation is unlikely, as the targets in the bacterial cell wall are highly conserved (24, 25, 40). Similar to its precursor PRF-119 (27), HY-133 is composed of the CHAP (cysteine- and histidine-dependent amidohydrolase/peptidase) domain from the endolysin of phage K acting as enzymatic active domain (EAD) and a lysostaphin-derived cell wall-binding domain (CBD) (18, 19). However, in HY-133, the EAD-CBD link has been shortened to increase the enzyme's stability and specificity (26). The MIC values determined across the complete study set of MRSA and MSSA isolates are comparably low, similar to those of HY-133 against African S. aureus complex strains, as shown previously (26).
Comparison of the MICs between the different groups of LA-MRSA and the groups of non-LA-MRSA and MSSA revealed that the MIC ranges of LA-MRSA carrying the methicillin resistance gene mecC appeared to be slightly wider than the MIC ranges of the other groups. The mecC gene shares only 70% identity at the genome level with its homologue mecA and encodes a penicillin-binding protein (PBP) that is 63% identical to the mecA-encoded PBP2a on the amino acid level (19). Nevertheless, it was previously demonstrated in principle that mecC is inducible by oxacillin and mediates β-lactam resistance in S. aureus (41). Kim et al. (42) found that the mecC-encoded PBP had a lower optimum temperature than that of PBP2a. Moreover, the enzyme's structure was shown to collapse when incubated at 37°C, suggesting a loss of activity at higher temperatures. This impaired transpeptidase function might influence the formation of the bacterium's pentaglycine cross bridges, the part of the peptidoglycan layer where the CHAP region of HY-133 is supposed to bind. Thus, an attack of HY-133 on the cell wall may be hampered, explaining a slightly higher MIC of HY-133 in rare cases.
In conclusion, HY-133 shows a broad spectrum of activity against different clonal lineages of mecA-, mecB-, and mecC-carrying LA-MRSA.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We especially thank Daniela Kuhn and Martina Schulte for excellent technical assistance.
This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the framework of the Infect Control 2020 consortium (03ZZ0805B “IRMRESS” to K.B. and G.P.) and in part by the German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), TTU 08.807 (8037808809 to K.B. and G.P.) and the #1Health-PREVENT consortium (01KI1727A to K.B.).
S.M. is employee of HYpharm GmbH. We have no other conflicts of interest to declare.
REFERENCES
- 1.de Neeling AJ, van den Broek MJM, Spalburg EC, van Santen-Verheuvel MG, Dam-Deisz WDC, Boshuizen HC, van de Giessen AW, van Duijkeren E, Huijsdens XW. 2007. High prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs. Vet Microbiol 122:366–372. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Van Duijkeren E, Box ATA, Heck MEOC, Wannet WJB, Fluit AC. 2004. Methicillin-resistant staphylococci isolated from animals. Vet Microbiol 103:91–97. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Van Cleef BA, Verkade EJM, Wulf MW, Buiting AG, Voss A, Huijsdens XW, Van Pelt W, Mulders MN, Kluytmans JA. 2010. Prevalence of livestock-associated MRSA in communities with high pig-densities in the Netherlands. PLoS One 5:8–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Köck R, Harlizius J, Bressan N, Laerberg R, Wieler LH, Witte W, Deurenberg RH, Voss A, Becker K, Friedrich AW. 2009. Prevalence and molecular characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among pigs on German farms and import of livestock-related MRSA into hospitals. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28:1375–1382. doi: 10.1007/s10096-009-0795-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Köck R, Mellmann A, Schaumburg F, Friedrich AW, Kipp F, Becker K. 2011. The epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Germany. Dtsch Arztebl Int 108:761–767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schaumburg F, Köck R, Mellmann A, Richter L, Hasenberg F, Kriegeskorte A, Friedrich AW, Gatermann S, Peters G, Von Eiff C, Becker K, study group . 2012. Population dynamics among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Germany during a 6-year period. J Clin Microbiol 50:3186–3192. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01174-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Van Rijen MML, Bosch T, Verkade EJM, Schouls L, Kluytmans JAJW. 2014. Livestock-associated MRSA carriage in patients without direct contact with livestock. PLoS One 9:e100294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Graveland H, Wagenaar JA, Heesterbeek H, Mevius D, van Duijkeren E, Heederik D. 2010. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in veal calf farming: human MRSA carriage related with animal antimicrobial usage and farm hygiene. PLoS One 5:4–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.van Alen S, Ballhausen B, Peters G, Friedrich AW, Mellmann A, Köck R, Becker K. 2017. In the centre of an epidemic: fifteen years of LA-MRSA CC398 at the University Hospital Münster. Vet Microbiol 200:19–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Köck R, Siam K, Al-Malat S, Christmann J, Schaumburg F, Becker K, Friedrich AW. 2011. Characteristics of hospital patients colonized with livestock-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) CC398 versus other MRSA clones. J Hosp Infect 79:292–296. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Becker K, Ballhausen B, Kahl BC, Köck R. 2017. The clinical impact of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus of the clonal complex 398 for humans. Vet Microbiol 200:33–38. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cuny C, Köck R, Witte W. 2013. Livestock associated MRSA (LA-MRSA) and its relevance for humans in Germany. Int J Med Microbiol 303:331–337. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.van Rijen MML, Van Keulen PH, Kluytmans JA. 2008. Increase in a Dutch hospital of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus related to animal farming. Clin Infect Dis 46:261–263. doi: 10.1086/524672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Köck R, Schaumburg F, Mellmann A, Köksal M, Jurke A, Becker K, Friedrich AW. 2013. Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as causes of human infection and colonization in Germany. PLoS One 8:e55040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shore AC, Deasy EC, Slickers P, Brennan G, O'Connell B, Monecke S, Ehricht R, Coleman DC. 2011. Detection of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type XI carrying highly divergent mecA, mecI, mecR1, blaZ, and ccr genes in human clinical isolates of clonal complex 130 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:3765–3773. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00187-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kriegeskorte A, Ballhausen B, Idelevich EA, Köck R, Friedrich AW, Karch H, Peters G, Becker K. 2012. Human MRSA isolates with novel genetic homolog, Germany. Emerg Infect Dis 18:1016–1018. doi: 10.3201/eid1806.110910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Petersen A, Stegger M, Heltberg O, Christensen J, Zeuthen A, Knudsen LK, Urth T, Sorum M, Schouls L, Larsen J, Skov R, Larsen AR. 2013. Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying the novel mecC gene in Denmark corroborates a zoonotic reservoir with transmission to humans. Clin Microbiol Infect 19:E16–E22. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Becker K, Ballhausen B, Köck R, Kriegeskorte A. 2014. Methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus isolates: the “mec alphabet” with specific consideration of mecC, a mec homolog associated with zoonotic S. aureus lineages. Int J Med Microbiol 304:794–804. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.García-Álvarez L, Holden Lindsay MTG, Webb H, Brown CR, Curran DFJ, Walpole MD, Brooks E, Pickard K, Teale DJ, Parkhill C, Bentley J, Edwards SD, Girvan GF, Kearns EK, Pichon AM, Hill B, Larsen RLR, Skov AR, Peacock RL, Maskell SJ, Holmes DJ, MA 2011. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a novel mecA homologue in human and bovine populations in the UK and Denmark: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis 11:595–603. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70126-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Becker K, van Alen S, Idelevich EA, Schleimer N, Seggewiß J, Mellmann A, Kaspar U, Peters G. 2018. Plasmid-encoded transferable mecB-mediated methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Emerg Infect Dis 24:242–248. doi: 10.3201/eid2402.171074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Michael GB, Kaspar H, Siqueira AK, de Freitas Costa E, Corbellini LG, Kadlec K, Schwarz S. 2017. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli isolates collected from diseased food-producing animals in the GERM-Vet monitoring program 2008-2014. Vet Microbiol 200:142–150. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fischer J, Hille K, Ruddat I, Mellmann A, Köck R, Kreienbrock L. 2017. Simultaneous occurrence of MRSA and ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae on pig farms and in nasal and stool samples from farmers. Vet Microbiol 200:107–113. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bortolaia V, Espinosa-Gongora C, Guardabassi L. 2016. Human health risks associated with antimicrobial-resistant enterococci and Staphylococcus aureus on poultry meat. Clin Microbiol Infect 22:130–140. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fischetti VA. 2005. Bacteriophage lytic enzymes: novel anti-infectives. Trends Microbiol 13:491–496. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2005.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schmelcher M, Donovan DM, Loessner MJ. 2012. Bacteriophage endolysins as novel antimicrobials. Future Microbiol 7:1147–1171. doi: 10.2217/fmb.12.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Idelevich EA, Schaumburg F, Knaack D, Scherzinger AS, Mutter W, Peters G, Peschel A, Becker K. 2016. The recombinant bacteriophage endolysin HY-133 exhibits in vitro activity against different African clonal lineages of the Staphylococcus aureus complex, including Staphylococcus schweitzeri. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:2551–2553. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02859-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Idelevich EA, von Eiff C, Friedrich AW, Iannelli D, Xia G, Peters G, Peschel A, Wanninger I, Becker K. 2011. In vitro activity against Staphylococcus aureus of a novel antimicrobial agent, PRF-119, a recombinant chimeric bacteriophage endolysin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:4416–4419. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00217-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Friedrich AW, Daniels-Haardt I, Köck R, Verhoeven F, Mellmann A, Harmsen D, van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Becker K, Hendrix MGR. 2008. EUREGIO MRSA-net Twente/Münsterland—a Dutch-German cross-border network for the prevention and control of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Euro Surveill 13:1–5. doi: 10.2807/ese.13.35.18965-en. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ciccolini M, Donker T, Köck R, Mielke M, Hendrix R, Jurke A, Rahamat-Langendoen J, Becker K, Niesters HGM, Grundmann H, Friedrich AW. 2013. Infection prevention in a connected world: the case for a regional approach. Int J Med Microbiol 303:380–387. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Becker K, Schaumburg F, Fegeler C, Friedrich AW, Köck R, Prevalence of Multiresistant Microorganisms PMM Study . 2017. Staphylococcus aureus from the German general population is highly diverse. Int J Med Microbiol 307:21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2016.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2017. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing— 27th ed CLSI document M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Handwerger S, Tomasz A. 1985. Antibiotic tolerance among clinical isolates of bacteria. Clin Infect Dis 7:368–386. doi: 10.1093/clinids/7.3.368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 1999. Methods for determining bactericidal activity of antimicrobial agents; approved guideline. CLSI document M26-A. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Coffey A, Ross RP. 2002. Bacteriophage-resistance systems in dairy starter strains: molecular analysis to application. Int J Gen Mol Microbiol 82:303–321. doi: 10.1023/A:1020639717181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Labrie SJ, Samson JE, Moineau S. 2010. Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:317–327. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Luria SE, Human ML. 1952. A nonhereditary, host-induced variation of bacterial viruses. J Bacteriol 64:557–569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Seed KD. 2015. Battling phages: how bacteria defend against viral attack. PLoS Pathog 11:1–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Luria SE. 1953. Host-induced modifications of viruses. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 18:237–244. doi: 10.1101/SQB.1953.018.01.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fenton M, Ross P, McAuliffe O, O'Mahony J, Coffey A. 2010. Recombinant bacteriophage lysins as antibacterials. Bioeng Bugs 1:9–16. doi: 10.4161/bbug.1.1.9818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Loeffler JM, Nelson D, Fischetti VA. 2001. Rapid killing of Streptococcus pneumoniae with a bacteriophage cell wall hydrolase. Science 294:2170–2172. doi: 10.1126/science.1066869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ballhausen B, Kriegeskorte A, Schleimer N, Peters G, Becker K. 2014. The mecA homolog mecC confers resistance against β-lactams in Staphylococcus aureus irrespective of the genetic strain background. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3791–3798. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02731-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kim C, Milheiriço C, Gardete S, Holmes MA, Holden MTG, De Lencastre H, Tomasz A. 2012. Properties of a novel PBP2A protein homolog from Staphylococcus aureus strain LGA251 and its contribution to the β-lactam-resistant phenotype. J Biol Chem 287:36854–36863. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.395962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]