Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 2;18(6):1797. doi: 10.3390/s18061797

Table 2.

Summary of published works on the deposition of c-axis AlN films.

Authors [ref]
(Year of Publication)
Substrate Sputtering Type Power (W)/Power Density (W/cm2) Substrate Temperature (°C) Sputtering Pressure (mTorr) Base Pressure (mbar) Nitrogen (%) Total Gas (sccm) Distance Target to Substrate (cm) FWHM (°) Deposition Rate (nm/min) Film Thickness (µm) Surface Roughness (nm) Notes
Ohtsuka et al. [17]
(2016)
sapphire Pulsed DC magnetron sputtering 800/9.86 550 3 to 11 - 50 - 6 3.3
(rocking curve)
60 1.5 - Effect of sputtering pressure on crystalline quality and residual stress.
Stan et al. [18]
(2015)
Si RF magnetron sputtering - 50 1.5 - 25 40 3.5 11, 7.1
(rocking curve)
19 0.6, 1.1 0.5 to 1.6 Investigated electric and pyroelectric properties of deposited films.
Wang et al. [19]
(2016)
Glass DC magnetron sputtering 170/9.55 400 9 - 15 35 4.7 - 66.5 8.35 48 Effects of substrate temperature and bias voltage on crystal orientation.
Jiao et al. [20]
(2015)
Si (100), Si (111), SiO2, and amorphous Si (α-Si) RF Magnetron sputtering 150, 200, 250, 300/5.3, 7.07, 8.84, 10.6 25 5 5 × 10−4 50, 66, 75, 80 60 6 - - - 4.22 Effect of various Si substrates on film quality.
Effect of RF power and gas flow on residual stress and film quality.
Bi et al. [21]
(2014)
Si (100) DC magnetron sputtering 460/5.34 400 3 1 × 10−10 85 22.8 7.5 1.63
(rocking curve)
7.5 1.8 - Measured the longitudinal piezoelectric coefficient of deposited films.
Shih et al. [22]
(2014)
Si3N4/Si RF Magnetron sputtering 200, 250, 300/NA 300 5, 10, 15 6.6 × 10−8 60 5 - 11.2 1.9 6.42 Effect of RF power and sputtering pressure on film quality.
Fabricated SAW device.
Stoeckel et al. [23]
(2014)
Si (100) Pulsed DC magnetron sputtering 865/7.6 350 5.25 - 80 7.5 0.39
(diffraction peak)
0.204 - - Measured transverse piezoelectric coefficient d31 using laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV).
Lim et al. [24]
(2001)
Si, Ru/Si and ZnO/Si RF magnetron sputtering - 150 0.5 - 50 - 5 5.96, 4.05, 1.19
(rocking curve)
8.4 0.5 to 0.6 - Efects of Si, Ru/Si and ZnO/Si substrates on the crystal quality of AlN film.
Yang et al. [25]
(2014)
Mo/Si (100) RF magnetron sputtering 200/7.07 20 to 600 7.5 2 × 10−7 50 6.5 2.4
(rocking curve)
- - - Effect of substrate temperature on film quality.
García Molleja et al. [26]
(2013)
SiO2/Si (100) DC reactive magnetron sputtering 100/11.68 25 3 2 × 10−8 30 3 0.8 to 0.19
(diffraction peak)
- 1.5 - Effect of film thickness on residual stress and film quality.
Monteagudo-Lerma et al. [27]
(2013)
C-sapphire RF reactive sputtering 100–175/5.1–8.94 400 3.5 1 × 10−5 100 10.5 1.63
(rocking curve)
- - 0.4 Effect of substrate bias, RF power and substrate temperature on deposited films.
Aissa et al. [28]
(2013)
Si (100) DC Magnetron sputtering 150/7.66 Room temp 3 6 × 10−5 35 40 3 - 20 to 40 580 for DCM and 980 for HiPMS - Comparison of the structural properties and residual stress as a function of sputtering pressure deposited via DCM and HiPMS.
Kale et al. [29]
(2012)
Si, copper, quartz RF magnetron sputtering 100/1.27 200 6 1 × 10−7 50 - 5 - - - - Structural and electrical properties as a function of N2 concentration.
Rodríguez-Madrid et al. [30]
(2012)
Microcrystalline diamond Balanced magnetron sputter deposition 700/NA 25 3 6.6 × 10−7 75 12 4.5 2
(rocking curve)
- 3 4.2 Effect of film thickness on film quality for SAW devices.
Jin et al. [31]
(2013)
Si (100) DC magnetron sputtering 270/9.55 430 3 5 × 10−6 50 100 - 2.259
(rocking curve)
21.78 1 1.97 Effect of substrate temperature on structural properties.
Ababneh et al. [32]
(2012)
Ti/Si02/Si DC magnetron sputtering 1000/3.183 - - 4 × 10−3 100 - 6.5 0.3
(diffraction peak)
- 0.6 1 Investigate the effect of the thickness and surface roughness of the Ti substrate to the crystal quality of the AlN film.
García-Gancedo et al. [33]
(2011)
IR/Si (100) Pulse DC magnetron sputtering 1200/6.79 400 1.2 2.3 × 10−5 70 - - 1.8
(rocking curve)
40 1.5 7 Sputtered AlN film to make bulk acoustic wave (BAW) sensors for biometric applications.
Phan and Chung [34]
(2011)
Si (100) Pulse DC magnetron sputtering - 25 3.5 5 × 10−7 90 - 8 0.21
(diffraction peak)
8 - - Effect of post annealing treatment for acoustic wave applications.
Singh et al. [35]
(2011)
N-type Si (100) RF magnetron sputtering 100,200,300/2.19,4.38,6.57 25 5, 10, 20 2 × 10−6 50 - 5 - - - - Effect of sputtering pressure on deposited films.
Cardenas-Valencia et al. [36]
(2011)
Sapphire Pulse DC magnetron sputtering 205/8.2 860 1.25, 1.5 - 50 11.5 - 0.32
(diffraction peak)
200 - - Novel sputtering method as the magnet was embedded in the target.
Iriarte et al. [37]
(2011)
Au/Si substrate Pulsed DC reactive ion beam 900/NA 50 2 6.6 × 10−8 55 65 5.5 1.3
(rocking curve)
- - 1.43 AlN growth on top of Au buffer layer.
Moreira et al. [38]
(2011)
P-Si (100) DC magnetron sputtering 50/2.04 50 3 2 × 10−8 27 80 - - 70 - - Electrical characterization of AlN prepared at different N2 concentration.
Singh et al. [39]
(2011)
Glass, Si, oxidized Si, Al–SiO2–Si, Cr– SiO2–Si, and Au–Cr–SiO2–Si RF magnetron sputtering 100,200,300/2.19,4.38,6.57 25 5,10,20 2 × 10−6 100 - - 0.32–0.40
(diffraction peak)
- 1 7.7 Comparison of AlN sputtered at different power and pressure on various substrates.
Subramanian et al. [40]
(2011)
Si (100), glass DC magnetron sputtering 180/NA 200 1.5 1 × 10−6 50 - 6 - - - - Mechanical and optical properties of deposited films.
Ababneh et al. [41]
(2010)
Si (100) DC Magnetron sputtering 300, 500/1.59, 3.18 150–200 1.5, 4.5 5 × 10−6 - 50 6.5 0.29–0.35
(diffraction peak)
6–12 0.5 - Effect of N2, sputtering pressure and DC power on deposited films.
Taurino et al. [42]
(2017)
SiO2/Si (100) RF magnetron sputtering 150/NA - 3 to 18 2 × 10−7 60 - 8 - - 0.2 and 0.5 - Control the deposition pressure to switch from (101) to (002) planes.
Vashai et al. [43]
(2009)
Silicon Pulse DC magnetron sputtering 1500/3.18–11.45 300 2.1 - 100 50 6 1.2–2.4
(rocking curve)
- 0.28 pa - Influence of sputtering parameters on film quality.
Clement et al. [44]
(2009)
Iridium layers Pulse DC magnetron sputtering 10000/NA 400 5 6.6 × 10−8 80 - 5 2
(rocking curve)
24 - - Comparison of BAW resonator performance on Mo and Ir substrates.
Cherng et al. [45]
(2008)
Si (100) Pulse DC magnetron sputtering 1500/NA - - 4 × 10−6 40–100 - 7 2
(rocking curve)
- - - Two step deposition method by varying power, pressure and N2 concentration.
Abdallah et al. [46]
(2008)
Si (100) DC reactive magnetron sputtering - 25 3 1.3 × 10−5 30 - 3 0.14–0.4
(FWHM of diffraction peak)
40 - - Effect of thickness on film quality.
Cherng and Chang [47] (2008) Pulse DC magnetron sputtering 600/NA 25 2 5.3 × 10−7 60 - 7 2
(rocking curve)
- 1.6 - Role of base pressure in AlN deposition.
Chiu et al. [48]
(2007)
DC reactive magnetron sputtering 1000–1600/5.42–8.77 250–450 3–7.5 - 30–100 - 2–12 2.7°
(rocking curve)
12 2 1 Effect of substrate temperature, sputtering power and N2 concentration on AlN films.
Kano et al. [49]
(2006)
Si, SiO2 RF magnetron sputtering 460/NA 100 3.75 - 50 - - 8.3
(rocking curve)
- - - Measured piezoelectric coefficient.
Venkataraj et al. [50]
(2006)
DC reactive magnetron sputtering 500/11.2 Room temp 6 1.3 × 10−4 variable - 5.5 0.4
(diffraction peak)
60 - - Effect of N2 concentration on structural, optical and mechanical properties of deposited films.
Benetti et al. [51]
(2006)
Diamond RF magnetron sputtering 500/2.74 200–500 3 - 100 - 5 0.4
(diffraction peak)
- - - Effect of sputtering temperature.
Kar et al. [52]
(2006)
Si (100) RF magnetron reactive sputtering 400/NA 200 4.5 3 × 10−6 variable - 5 - 5.5 - 2.4 Effect of nitrogen concentration of film quality.
Umeda et al. [53]
(2006)
Si (100) RF magnetron sputtering 1300–1800/7.38–10.2 200 1.5 1 × 10−6 70 60 5 1.4 and 2.1
(rocking curve)
- - 1.7 Effect of sputtering parameters on residual stress
Guo et al. [54]
(2006)
Sapphire RF magnetron sputtering 100–250/1.27–3.18 100 5 1 × 10−7 40 9 - - 8 - 6 Effect of sputtering power.
Medjani et al. [55]
(2006)
Si (100) RF magnetron sputtering 150/NA 25, 400,800 3.75 4 × 10−9 14 18 6.5 - - - - Effect of substrate temperature and bias voltage on the crystallite orientation.
Vergara et al. [56]
(2006)
Si (100) RF magnetron sputtering - 900–1300 6.75 2.5 × 10−7 50 - - - - - - Effect of rapid thermal annealing on piezoelectric response.
Kar et al. [57]
(2006)
P-type Si (100) RF magnetron sputtering 400/NA 100–400 4.5 3 × 10−6 80 - 8 - - - 2 Role of sputtering temperature.
Jang et al. [58] (2006) P-type Si RF magnetron sputtering 100/1.23 300 2–5.25 6.6 × 10−5 - - - - - - - Effect of rapid thermal annealing in oxygen ambient.
Kar et al. [59]
(2005)
Silicon, copper, quartz RF magnetron reactive sputtering 400/NA 200 4.5 3 × 10−6 80 - 5 0.25
(diffraction peak)
- - 2.1–3.68 Influence of rapid thermal annealing on morphological and electrical properties.
Iriarte et al. [60]
(2005)
Al, Mo, Ti, TiN, and Ni Pulse DC magnetron sputtering 900/4.97 - 2 6.6 × 10−8 70 - 5.5 1.3
(rocking curve)
- - - Comparison of metallic substrates on crystal orientation.
Zhang et al. [61]
(2005)
Si (100), Si 111) RF magnetron sputtering 200–500/1.76–4.42 350 6 3.7 × 10−7 100 - 8 - - - - Effect of sputtering power on crystal quality and strain in film.
Sanz-Hervas et al. [62]
(2005)
Al, Si02, Cr, Mo and Ti RF reactive sputtering 800/NA - 7 - 50 - - - - - - Effect of substrate bias on crystal quality.