Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurol Sci. 2018 Feb 22;387:199–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.02.031

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Scatter plot of big vs. laminated MULES baseline scores for participants who completed both test versions (n = 57). Linear correlation demonstrates strong agreement between baseline scores of each version (r = 0.89, p < 0.0001). Accounting for participant age, big MULES scores were significant predictors of time scores for the new laminated version (p < 0.001, linear regression).