Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biometrics. 2017 Oct 31;74(2):714–724. doi: 10.1111/biom.12790

Table 4.

Posterior distributions of association parameters under different scenarios. Unless specified, the sampling interval was 10 minutes. MPM: Mean of the posterior mean across all simulations. 95% CI: Mean of the boundaries of the 95% equal tailed credible intervals across the simulations.

# of Res. per trigger, ρ Spread, ν(min) Mass correlation, ρa



Truth MPM 95% I Truth MPM 95% I Truth MPM 95% I
24 hour study
 Scenario 1 (Imperfect, large resp.) 0.7 0.74 (0.61,0.83) 10 10.7 (8.8,12.8) 0.7 0.75 (0.57,0.89)
 Scenario 2 (Imperfect, small resp.) 0.7 0.76 (0.65,0.97) 10 11.8 (9.3,17.0) 0.7 0.70 (0.61,0.95)
 Scenario 3 (Perfect, large resp.) 1.0 1.02 (0.93,1.06) 10 10.6 (9.8,11.2) 0.7 0.68 (0.57,0.84)
12 hour study
 Scenario 2 0.7 0.54 (0.37,0.76) 10 10.8 (7.1,16.0) 0.7 0.62 (0.05,0.98)
6 hour study
 Scenario 2 0.7 0.57 (0.33,0.89) 10 12.8 (6.5,23.7) 0.7 0.50 (0.02,0.95)
 Scenario 2 (5 min. sampling) 0.7 0.79 (0.48,1.21) 10 14.5 (8.3,25.5) 0.7 0.64 (0.03,0.98)
Association model misspecified
 Scenario 4 (No association) 6.15 (0.18,11.38) 1142 (370,2350) 0 −0.20 (−0.98,0.95)
 Scenario 5 (2 triggers, average of 2–3 extra resp. pulses) 0.7 1.30 (0.70,1.69) 10 27.1 (20.2,35.1) 0.7 0.25 (−0.73,0.96)
 Scenario 6 (2 triggers, average 6–7 extra resp. pulses) 0.7 4.75 (0.16,11.43) 142 (8.2,459) 0.7 −0.02 (−0.91,0.92)
 Scenario 7 (Resp. not pulsing) 0.24 (0.16,0.43) 74.0 (8.2,459) 0 0.12 (−0.80,0.89)