Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 27;34(13):i537–i546. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty288

Table 1.

Summary of algorithms for comparison

Algorithm BLAST data Algorithm parameters Weights One-to-one Enforced coverage Type
AlignMCL -log2 (e-value) inter-network Yes No No Local
AlignNemo e-values inter-network Yes No No Local
CUFID -log2 (e-value) inter-network Yes Yes No Global
HubAlign -log2 (e-value) inter-network No Yes Yes Global
IsoRankN -log2 (e-value) intra & inter-network -K 10 –thresh 1e–5 –alpha 0.7 –maxveclen 2000000 No No No Global
MAGNA++ -log2 (e-value) inter-network -p 15000 -n 2000 -a 0.5 -t 4 -m S3 No Yes Yes Global
MI-GRAAL -log2 (e-value) inter-network -p 19 No Yes Yes Global
NETAL -log2 (e-value) intra & inter-network -b 0.5 -c 0.5 No Yes No Global
NetCoffee e-values intra & inter-network No Yes No Global
NetworkBLAST e-values inter-network beta 0.9; blast_th 1e–30; true_factor0 0.5; true_factor1 0.5 Yes No No Local
PINALOG -log2 (e-value) inter-network No Yes No Local
SANA -log2 (e-value) inter-network -s3 0.5 -sequence 0.5 No Yes Yes Global
SMETANA -log2 (e-value) inter-network Yes No No Global
WAVE -log2 (e-value) inter-network No Yes Yes Global
PrimAlign-Seq e-values inter-network No No No Global
PrimAlign-Topo unweighted inter-network No No No Global
PrimAlign -log2 (e-value) inter-network Yes No No Global

Note: Enforced coverage means that all proteins from the smaller network need to be aligned.