Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 27;34(13):i537–i546. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty288

Table 4.

Statistical comparison of PrimAlign with the others

Aligner Weighted KO GO EN IP CE-F CE-O LCCC-F LCCC-O
AlignMCL No *** *** ** **
AlignMCL Yes *** *** ** **
AlignNemo No *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
AlignNemo Yes *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
CUFID No *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
CUFID Yes *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
HubAlign No *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
IsoRankN No *** *** *** *** *** ***
MAGNA++ No *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
MI-GRAAL No NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
NETAL No *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
NetCoffee No *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
NetworkBLAST No *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
NetworkBLAST Yes *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
PINALOG No *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
SANA No *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
SMETANA No *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
SMETANA Yes *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
WAVE No *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

Notes: Statistical comparison of differences in evaluation measures between PrimAlign with unweighted networks on input and the other algorithms for human-yeast alignment. (empty field) P > 0.05

*

P ≤ 0.05

**

P ≤ 0.01

***

P ≤ 0.001. Green = improvement.