Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 12;34(13):2177–2184. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty078

Table 2.

Performance of EMASE, RSEM, kallisto, unique-reads and WASP on identifying ASE using significance tests with Beta-Binomial model at α/2=0.01 on simulated data

Method True positive True negative False positive False negative No call
EMASE M2 4595 2805 115 2459 61
RSEM 4519 2827 86 2524 79
kallisto 4406 2808 102 2624 95
unique-reads 3038 1518 96 1351 4032
WASP 1864 823 251 1245 5852