Table 3. A List of Phenomena Collected From the Literature Review.

Phenomenon	Tversky and Simonson (1993)	Pettibone and Wedell (2000)	Roe et al. (2001)	Usher and McClelland (2004)	Tsetsos, Usher, and Chater (2010)	Soltani et al. (2012)	Wollschläger and Diederich (2012)	Bhatia (2013)	Trueblood et al. (2014)	Tsetsos, Scheibehenne, Berkowitsch, Rieskamp, and Mata (2017)	Not discussed in previous work
Note. We have included three phenomena addressed in earlier articles on DbS (top rows). For completeness we have also included the effect of familiarity on the attraction and compromise effects, the centrality effect, and the perceptual focus effect. A check mark (✓) indicates which phenomenon were discussed in which articles.
Incidental value	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	✓
Attribute distribution	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	✓
Loss aversion	—	—	—	✓	—	—	✓	—	—	—	—
Attraction	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	—
Location of decoy	—	✓	—	—	—	—	—	✓	✓	—	—
Distance to decoy	—	✓	—	—	—	✓	—	—	—	—	—
Time pressure	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	✓	✓	—	—
Familiarity	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	✓
Correlation with the compromise effect	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	✓	—
Anti-correlation with the similarity effect	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	✓	—
Compromise	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	—
Time pressure	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	✓	✓	✓	—
Familiarity	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	✓
Anti-correlation with the similarity effect	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	✓	—
Similarity	—	—	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	—
Time pressure	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	✓	—
Alignability	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	✓	—	—	—
Attribute balance	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	✓	—	—
Attribute range	—	✓	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Attribute spacing	—	✓	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Background contrast	✓	—	—	—	—	—	✓	—	—	—	—
Centrality	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	✓
Less is more	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	✓	—	—	—
Endowment	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	✓	—	—	—
Perceptual focus	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	✓
Phantom decoy	—	✓	—	—	✓	—	—	✓	—	—	—
Polarization	✓	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—