Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 28.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Jul 3;126(3):626–633. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.06.028

Table 3.

Threshold of sensory perception, latency and amplitude of facial CMAP and amplitude of masseter muscle EMG recordings.

Patients
n=28
Controls
n=25
% p value
Sensory perception (mv) 2.6±0.6 1.8±0.3 17 0.01
Facial CMAP Latency (ms) 3.1±0.6 2.8±0.4 10 0.08
Facial CMAP Amplitude (uv) 1650±886 2079±832 −21 0.09
Mastoid-Nose Distance (cm) 15.4±1.3 15.1±1.2 2 0.33
Amplitude SEMG Masseter (uv) 709±402 1045±332 −32 0.02

n: number of subjects, %: Percentage of change in patients vs. controls. p: significance of t-tests and Mann–Whitney U-test. SEMG: Surface EMG, CMAP: Compound muscle action potential. All data are mean±SD.