Table 1.
Technique | Microtiter Well Plates | Droplet Microfluidics | Single Phase Microfluidics |
---|---|---|---|
Pros | Parallelizable | Extremely high parallel throughput | Very fast readout |
Miniaturization | Post processing possible | Continuous process possible | |
Many commercial options available | Commercial options are currently emerging Highly customizable |
Allows motility and viability assay High control over concentration via diffusion Highly customizable |
|
Neutral | Current gold standard | Emerging technology (start-ups) | Niche technology |
Cons | Long assay durations (days) | No industrial standard yet | Lower throughput |
Evaporation | Needs additional handling of oil and surfactants to generate droplets | Sample volumes are not isolated | |
Local concentration gradients | Adding of compounds over time requires additional chip architecture | Unwanted diffusion Currently no commercial availability |