Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 28;8:9057. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27350-z

Table 3.

Analysis of Similarities (ANOSIM). Analysis conducted on samples collected above 10 cmbsf *indicates significant difference (p < 0.05).

Halo Mica U-166 Anona Ewing Bank Viosca Knoll Mardi Gras
Bacterial Phylotype Composition
Halo 0.00
Mica 0.34** 0.00
U-166 0.38** 0.16* 0.00
Anona 0.36* 0.06 0.06 0.00
Ewing Bank 0.29** 0.21** 0.12* 0.07 0.00
Viosca Knoll 0.31* 0.10 0.22** 0.33* 0.17* 0.00
Mardi Gras 0.49** 0.25* 0.15* −0.01 0.21* 0.32* 0.00
Archaeal Phylotype Composition
Halo 0.00
Mica 0.17* 0.00
U-166 0.16* 0.04 0.00
Anona 0.11 0.10 0.00 0.00
Ewing Bank 0.15* 0.04 0.04 0.08 0.00
Viosca Knoll 0.12 −0.03 0.03 0.09 0.09 0.00
Mardi Gras 0.24* 0.28* 0.25* −0.10 0.25* 0.20* 0.00

**Indicates highly significant difference (p < 0.001).