Table 1. Summary of patients.

No.	Age (yr)	Sex	Site of defects	Etiology	Follow-up (yr)	Complication	Corrective	Asymmetry	Patient satisfaction	No. of implants used
1	23	F	Malar	Aesthetic	5	No	No	No	Yes	1
2	28	F	Malar	Aesthetic	7	No	No	No	Yes	2
3	32	F	Malar	Aesthetic	5	No	No	No	Yes	2
4	25	F	Malar	Congenital	5	No	No	No	Yes	2
5	22	F	Malar	Congenital	5	No	No	No	Yes	2
			Paranasal
6	30	F	Malar	Trauma	6	No	No	No	Yes	2
7	35	F	Malar	Trauma	5	No	No	No	Yes	1
8	32	F	Malar	Aesthetic	5	No	No	No	Yes	2
9	20	M	Malar	Trauma	5	No	No	No	Yes	4
			Nasal
10	25	M	Orbit	Aesthetic	7	No	No	No	Yes	3
11	30	F	Mandibular body & angle	Aesthetic	6	No	No	No	Yes	2
12	26	F	Mandibular body & angle	Aesthetic	6	Infection	Angle implant removed	Yes	No	2
13	20	F	Malar	Congenital	5	Displacement & infection	Incision and drainage	Yes	No	1
14	24	F	Paranasal	Congenital	5	No	No	No	Yes	1
15	24	M	Chin	Aesthetic	5	No	No	No	Yes	1
16	26	F	Chin	Trauma	6	No	No	No	Yes	2

(F: female, M: male)