Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 14;7(1):e11. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.9554

Table 5.

Marginal effects of age group and sex on the probability of time on Facebook.

Variable Stayed about the samea, respondent probability (95% CI) P value Increaseda, respondent probability (95% CI) P value Decreaseda, respondent probability (95% CI) P value
Age group (years)






18-29 0.43 (0.33-0.52) <.001 0.08 (0.03-0.14) .001 0.49 (0.40-0.58) <.001

30-49 0.49 (0.41-0.57) <.001 0.15 (0.09-0.21) <.001 0.36 (0.28-0.44) <.001

50+ 0.66 (0.59-0.74) <.001 0.10 (0.05-0.14) <.001 0.24 (0.17-0.31) <.001
Sex






Male 0.58 (0.50-0.65) <.001 0.10 (0.05-0.14) <.001 0.32 (0.26-0.39) <.001

Female 0.51 (0.44-0.58) <.001 0.12 (0.08-0.17) <.001 0.37 (0.30-0.43) <.001
Age group by sex (years)






Male







18-29 0.46 (0.36-0.56) <.001 0.08 (0.03-0.13) .003 0.46 (0.36-0.56) <.001


30-49 0.53 (0.43-0.63) <.001 0.13 (0.06-0.20) <.001 0.34 (0.25-0.43) <.001


Age 50+ 0.70 (0.61-0.79) <.001 0.08 (0.03-0.13) .001 0.22 (0.14-0.30) <.001

Female







18-29 0.40 (0.29-0.51) <.001 0.09 (0.03-0.15) .003 0.51 (0.40-0.62) <.001


30-49 0.46 (0.37-0.55) <.001 0.16 (0.09-0.24) <.001 0.38 (0.29-0.47) <.001


50+ 0.64 (0.55-0.72) <.001 0.11 (0.05-0.16) .001 0.26 (0.18-0.33) <.001

aMarginal effects from multinomial logistic regression, adjusted for income, employment status, ethnicity, race, and education; 95% confidence intervals in parentheses.