Table 1.

Quality Assessment by the Readers

Assessment of Susceptibility Maps by the three Readers	Method 1			Method 2
	Reader 1	Reader 2	Reader 3	Reader 1	Reader 2	Reader 3
Visibility of the Lesions	2.7 ± 1.4	2.1 ± 0.9	2.5 ± 1.3	3.3 ± 1.1	2.4 ± 1.1	3.0 ± 1.1
		2.4 ± 1.2			2.9 ± 1.1
Quality of the Susceptibility Map in the Prostate Region	2.5 ± 0.9	1.9 ± 0.9	2.5 ± 0.9	2.9 ± 0.8	2.4 ± 0.7	3.3 ± 0.7
		2.3 ± 1.0			2.8 ± 0.8
Quality of the Susceptibility Map in the Reference Region	2.7 ± 0.8	2.1 ± 0.7	3.7 ± 0.4	2.6 ± 0.6	2.1 ± 0.7	3.7 ± 0.5
		2.9 ± 0.9			2.8 ± 0.9
Visibility of the Lesions (Direct Comparison)	3.1 ± 1.2	2.1 ± 0.8	2.9 ± 1.2	3.3 ± 1.2	2.5 ± 1.0	3.1 ± 1.1
		2.7 ± 1.1			2.9 ± 1.1
Quality of the Susceptibility Map in the Prostate Region (Direct Comparison)	2.2 ± 0.8	1.9 ± 0.8	2.7 ± 0.9	3.1 ± 0.8	2.6 ± 0.8	3.0 ± 0.8
		2.3 ± 0.9			2.9 ± 0.8
Quality of the Susceptibility Map in the Reference Region (Direct Comparison)	2.6 ± 0.6	2.4 ± 0.6	3.8 ± 0.6	3.2 ± 0.7	2.7 ± 0.6	3.8 ± 0.6
		2.9 ± 0.9			3.2 ± 0.8

Note: Scores ranged from 1 (poor) to 4 (good). Mean and standard deviation of scores for each reader individually and of scores for all readers are shown.