Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 22;9:1038. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01038

Table 3.

Results of the mixed ANOVAs taking treatment and occasion as inter-groups and within-group factors.

Statement Treatment
Occasion
Interaction
dchange (95%CI)
F p F p F p
(1) Treatment logic 1.22 0.276 2.81 0.101 0.14 0.714 −0.01 (−0.62, 0.60)
(2) Treatment satisfaction 0.18 0.675 9.75 0.003 0.79 0.378 −0.05 (−0.68, 0.58)
(3) Recommending to others 0.63 0.432 15.27 <0.001 0.15 0.704 0.19 (−0.47, 0.85)
(4) Usefulness for other disorders 1.26 0.267 4.15 0.048 0.63 0.430 0.31 (−0.31, 0.93)
(5) Usefulness for the patient 0.01 0.925 4.72 0.035 0.14 0.713 0.29 (−0.33, 0.91)
(6) Unpleasantness 0.03 0.865 4.10 0.049 0.18 0.672 −0.11 (−0.72, 0.50)
Total score 0.31 0.583 13.68 0.001 0.06 0.809 0.26 (−0.40, 0.92)

F = F statistic for testing the significance of the treatment, the occasion, and the treatment × occasion interaction; all F-tests had 1 and 42 degrees of freedom. p = probability level associated to the F-test. dchange = standardized mean change between the two treatments (positive dchange values indicated a larger increase from expectations to satisfaction in EMMA than in TAU). 95%CI: 95% confidence limits for dchange. Item 6 is answered in reverse, and so it has been recoded to follow the same scoring criteria as the other five items on the scale.