Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 27;6(2):272–287. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00350

TABLE 3.

ITN Ownership, Access, and Use (%) at Baseline and Endline, by Comparisona and Intervention Sites

Baseline (N=753)
Endline (N=1,450)
Rest of Wave 1(Comparison) Ogoja LGA(2 Rounds) Obubra LGA(3 Rounds) Ikom LGA(Comparison) Ogoja LGA(2 Rounds) Obubra LGA(3 Rounds)
Household level
Owns at least 1 ITN 63.9 (56.4, 70.8) 49.5 (44.7, 54.3) 51.1 (35.3, 66.7) 43.3(37.4, 49.4) 76.4(71.2, 81.0) 77.9(71.5, 83.1)
Owns at least 1 ITN per 2 people 24.4 (17.8, 32.5) 17.7 (13.0, 23.7) 17.4 (11.8, 25.0) 13.9(10.7, 17.8) 29.9(25.1, 35.2) 30.3(26.1, 34.8)
ITN supply
Less than 1 ITN per 3 people 21.1(16.2, 27.2) 16.8 (13.1, 21.5) 20.8 (15.1, 27.9) 20.5(15.8, 26.2) 23.2(19.8, 26.9) 23.6(20.5, 27.0)
1 ITN per 3 people 18.4 (14.3, 23.2) 15.0(10.5, 20.9) 12.9(7.8, 20.6) 8.9(6.5, 12.0) 23.4(19.3, 27.9) 24.0(20.3, 28.1)
1 ITN per 2 people 21.1 (16.7, 26.2) 13.5 (9.7, 18.6) 14.5 (9.5, 21.6) 12.2(9.1, 16.2) 23.8(19.6, 28.5) 22.8(19.0, 27.0)
1 ITN or more per person 3.3 (1.2, 9.2) 4.2 (2.3, 7.6) 2.9 (1.1, 7.5) 1.7(0.9, 16.2) 6.2(4.1, 9.2) 7.5(5.2, 10.8)
Population level
Population access to ITNb 46.8 (40.0, 53.7) 35.7 (32.0, 39.5) 33.5(23.2, 45.6) 25.7(21.9, 29.9) 53.1(48.0, 58.0) 54.7(48.4, 60.9)
ITN use previous night 41.8 (35.6, 48.3) 28.9 (26.1, 31.8) 28.5(17.9, 42.0) 16.8(13.7, 20.4) 24.0(20.6, 27.7) 31.6(26.1, 37.6)
ITN use previous night among population with access to ITN 92.5 (86.3, 99.0) 84.7 (81.4, 88.5) 88.3(77.9, 99.8) 66.7(63.6, 70.3) 45.7(42.3, 49.4) 61.2(55.3, 66.7)

Abbreviations: ITN, insecticide-treated net; LGA, local government area.

All data shown as % (95% confidence interval).

a

The rest of the LGAs (8 total) in the wave 1 distribution served as the comparison group at baseline, while Ikom LGA served as the comparison at endline.

b

Proportion of the population with access to an ITN within their household (assuming each ITN in a household can be used by 2 people).