Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 1;10(6):708. doi: 10.3390/nu10060708

Table 2.

Richness, alpha diversity, beta diversity.

Reference [42] [43] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41]
Indexes/Method YF PR Ill Miseq Ill Hiseq Ro
Faecal bacterial counts > n n n n n n n n n
Alpha diversity/Richness on at least one taxonomic level (Chao 1 index, *other indexes) n n > n - - <* - n -
Overall Beta diversity (weighted Unifrac, °other indexes) n n sd sd sd ° sd ° n ° sd

This table shows the significant differences in faecal bacterial counts, alpha diversity/richness and beta diversity between healthy controls (HC) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). > symbolizes a higher abundance in HC when compared to PD; < symbolizes a lower abundance in HC when compared to PD; - symbolises that no statistical significant difference was found between HC and PD; sd indicates a statistically significantly difference; n symbolizes, that no information was given. The methods used by the studies are Yakult Intestinal Flora-SCAN (YF), 96-well block of the ABI PRISM 7900HT Sequence Detection System (PR), Illumina Miseq sequencing (Ill Miseq), Illumina Hiseq sequencing (Ill Hiseq), Roche 454 GS FLX Titanium sequencing (Ro). * symbolzises that other alpha diversity indexes where used, like Shannon, Simpson and Richness (Margalef) [38]. ° symbolzises, that other beta diversity indexes where used, like unweighted Unifrac [36], Shannon [37] or univariate tests [39]