Table 3.
Firmicutes.
| Reference | [42] | [43] | [34] | [35] | [36] | [37] | [38] | [39] | [40] | [41] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxa/Method | YF | PR | Ill Miseq | Ill Hiseq | Ro | ||||||
| Unclassified Firmicutes (unclass.) | < | ||||||||||
| Firmicutes unspecified (unspec.) | > | ||||||||||
| Lactobacillaceae unspec. | > | < | < | < | |||||||
| Lactobacillus, m = mucosae, g = gassero, c = caseo, f = fermentum, re = reuteri, ru = ruminis, |
<(+g, c, f, re, ru) | <(+m) | < | ||||||||
| Enterococcaceae unspec | > | < | < | ||||||||
| Enterococcus | < | ||||||||||
| Ruminococcaceae unclassified | < | ||||||||||
| Ruminococcaceae OTU 4439469 | <(o1) | < | |||||||||
| Ruminococcus, b = bromii, c = callidus | <(b) | >(c) | > | ||||||||
| Papillibacter c = cinnamivorans | <(c) | ||||||||||
| Faecalibacterium, p = prausnitzi | >(p) | > | >(o2) | > | |||||||
| Lachnospiraceae unclassified | >(o3) | ||||||||||
| Lachnospiraceae unspec | > | ||||||||||
| Roseburia | >(+o2) | > | |||||||||
| Coprococcus, e = eutactus | >(e) | >(o1) | > | ||||||||
| Blautia, g = glucerasea | >(g) | >(+o1) | > | > | |||||||
| Dorea, l = longicatea | >(+l) | ||||||||||
| Catabacteriaceae Catabacter, h = honkongenesis | <(+h) | ||||||||||
| Clostridiaceae Anaerotruncus | < | ||||||||||
| Clostridium, c = coccoides, s = saccharolyticum | >(c) | >(s) | |||||||||
| Eubacteriaceae, [candidatus stoquefichus massiliensis] | > | ||||||||||
| Erysipeltrichoceae unspec. | < | ||||||||||
| Eubacterium, b = biforme | >(b) | ||||||||||
| Christensenellaceae unclass. | < | ||||||||||
| unspec | < | ||||||||||
| Christensenella, m = minuta | <(+m) | ||||||||||
| Oscillospiraceae, oscillospira | < | < | |||||||||
| Streptococcaceae, unspec | < | ||||||||||
| Streptococcus | < | ||||||||||
| Acidaminococcaceae, Acidaminococcus | < | ||||||||||
| Veillonellaceae unspec | < | ||||||||||
| Veillonellaceae, Megamonas | < | ||||||||||
| Veillonellaceae Megasphera | < | ||||||||||
| [Tissierellaceae] unspec. | < | ||||||||||
This table shows the significant relative changes in the Firmicutes phyla between PD patients (PD) and healthy controls (HC), that were assessed by the 10 summarized Parkinson’s disease studies. > symbolizes a higher abundance in HC when compared to PD; < symbolizes a lower abundance in HC when compared to PD; An empty cell symbolizes, that no significant change in PD compared to HC was found with the chosen methodological approach. o1, 2, 3 symbolize, that one, two, or three OTUs of the taxa were significantly changed in PD compared to HC; + indicates that a change in PD compared to HC on the genus and on the species level was found. The methods used by the studies are Yakult Intestinal Flora-SCAN (YF), 96-well block of the ABI PRISM 7900HT Sequence Detection System (PR), Illumina Miseq sequencing (Ill Miseq), Illumina Hiseq sequencing (Ill Hiseq), Roche 454 GS FLX Titanium sequencing (Ro).