Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 1;15(6):1136. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061136

Table 2.

Prevalence and odds ratios comparing poor/fair health among men by sexual minority status and state policy environment.

Study Sample Weighted Prevalence (%) Unadjusted OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Men in all 31 study states
Heterosexual 16.4 1.00 [Reference] 1.00 [Reference]
Sexual Minority 17.4 1.07 (0.95–1.21) 1.10 (0.94–1.28)
Men in 16 study states with comprehensive protections
Heterosexual 15.4 1.00 [Reference] 1.00 [Reference]
Sexual Minority 14.9 0.96 (0.82–1.13) 0.96 (0.79–1.16)
Men in 15 study states with limited protections
Heterosexual 17.4 1.00 [Reference] 1.00 [Reference]
Sexual Minority 20.6 1.23 (1.03–1.47) ** 1.30 (1.03–1.64) **

Source: 2014–2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Notes: OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval. Adjusted OR estimates are from logistic regression models adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, relationship status, children in the household, educational attainment, household income, employment status, chronic disease status, health insurance status, usual source of care, state of residence, and survey year. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.05.