Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 1;15(6):1136. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061136

Table 3.

Prevalence and odds ratios comparing poor/fair health among women by sexual minority status and state policy environment.

Study Sample Weighted Prevalence (%) Unadjusted OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Women in all 31 study states
Heterosexual 17.7 1.00 [Reference] 1.00 [Reference]
Sexual Minority 20.7 1.21 (1.09–1.35) ** 1.35 (1.17–1.55) ***
Women in 16 study states with comprehensive protections
Heterosexual 16.1 1.00 [Reference] 1.00 [Reference]
Sexual Minority 19.5 1.26 (1.08–1.46) ** 1.44 (1.19–1.75) ***
Women in 15 study states with limited protections
Heterosexual 19.2 1.00 [Reference] 1.00 [Reference]
Sexual Minority 22.0 1.19 (1.01–1.40) ** 1.28 (1.04–1.57) **

Source: 2014–2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Notes: OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval. Adjusted OR estimates are from logistic regression models adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, relationship status, children in the household, educational attainment, household income, employment status, chronic disease status, health insurance status, usual source of care, state of residence, and survey year. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.05.