Table 3.
Multivariate Regression Results: Specific Factors as per survey (derived from initial FGD & theory-driven).
| Form of Capital | Factors | Variable | Prevalence | Bivariate Linear Regression Coefficient | Multiple Linear Regression Coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social | Participation in community groups | Any individual in household participates in a community group | 18.4% | 0.66 (0.20, 1.12)(p = 0.005) | 0.51 (0.06, 0.97)(p = 0.027) |
| Perception of corruption | Perceives local government to be less corrupt | 38.7% | 0.38 (0.01, 0.75)(p = 0.045) | 0.30 (−0.06, 0.66)(p = 0.098) | |
| Perceives regional government to be less corrupt | 18.6% | 0.08 (−0.39, 0.54)(p = 0.743) | - | ||
| Perceives national government to be less corrupt | 14.6% | 0.05 (−0.47, 0.56)(p = 0.861) | - | ||
| Migration status | Community member who self-identified as living in the community after the construction of the IOH (equivalent to having moved to the community within the past 10 years) | 61.3% | −0.18 (−0.55, 0.19)(p = 0.349) | - | |
| Decision-making power | Thinks that their opinion is valued in the community | 55.2% | 0.45 (0.09, 0.81)(p = 0.015) | - | |
| Feels that community has influence in decisions about land use | 24.0% | 0.30 (−0.15, 0.70)(p = 0.198) | - | ||
| Human | Age | Average of head of household | 39.4 (12.7) | −0.01 (−0.02, 0.01)(p = 0.297) | - |
| Gender | Male head of household | 88.7% | −0.28 (−0.56, 0.01)(p = 0.057) | 0.26 (−0.01, 0.53)(p = 0.062) | |
| Marital Status | Head of household is married | 79.1% | 0.59 (0.15, 1.03)(p = 0.009) | - | |
| Education | Head of household has some secondary education or more | 63.4% | 0.27 (-0.11, 0.64)(p = 0.159) | - | |
| Household size | Number of individuals in household | 4.0 (3, 5) | 0.18 (0.07, 0.28)(p = 0.001) | 0.16 (0.06, 0.26)(p = 0.002) | |
| Healthy in past year | No health issues reported | 66.5% | −0.29 (−0.68, 0.09)(p = 0.130) | - | |
| Health insurance | Household is enrolled in ‘SIS’ | 68.8% | −0.14 (−0.53, 0.25)(p = 0.491) | - | |
| Time get to get to health care | Able to reach first point of care in <=1 h (only among those HHs that faced a health problem) | 55.9% | Na | - | |
| Financial | Wealth | Wealth Index | 0.4 (0.15) | 1.87 (0.64, 3.10)(p = 0.003) | 1.02 (−0.30, 2.34)(p = 0.130) |
| Home ownership | Owns home | 68.0% | −0.03 (−0.42, 0.36)(p = 0.872) | - | |
| Access to land | Owns/rents >1 hectare of land | 31.2% | 0.32 (−0.06, 0.71)(p = 0.102) | - | |
| Physical | Natural resources | Enters woods regularly | 54.8% | 0.37 (0.01, 0.73)(p = 0.046) | - |
| Air and water quality | Considers water to be clean | 28.5% | 0.24 (−0.16, 0.64)(p = 0.245) | - | |
| Considered air to be clean | 19.4% | 0.35 (−0.11, 0.80)(p = 0.133) | - | ||
| Food security | Fully food secure | 29.3% | 0.78 (0.39, 1.17)(p < 0.001) | 0.72 (0.33, 1.10)(p < 0.001) | |
| Water security | Has access to improved drinking water | 84.5% | 0.67 (0.18, 1.16)(p = 0.007) | - | |
| Personal | Security | Feels secure in community | 63.0% | 0.49 (0.11, 0.86)(p = 0.010) | 0.42 (0.06, 0.78)(p = 0.023) |