Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 1;15(6):1143. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061143

Table 3.

Responses of cases and controls to work-related issues possibly associated with scrub typhus.

Work Related Factors Response Total, 171 (%) Case, 57(%) Control, 114 (%) Crude OR * (95% CI) p-Value
Residence house has separate shower yes 152 (88.9) 54 (94.7) 98 (86.0) 2.93 (0.81–10.53) 0.085
A wetland or a puddle of water around the house yes 33 (19.3) 17 (29.8) 16 (14.0) 2.60 (1.19–5.65) 0.014
Wild mice seen yes 46 (26.9) 15 (26.3) 31 (27.2) 0.95 (0. 46-1.96) 0.903
Rat secretion seen yes 40 (23.4) 16 (28.1) 24 (21.1) 1.46 (0.70–3.04) 0.307
Rice field related work (cultivating a rice field) yes 71 (41.5) 25 (43.9) 46 (40.4) 1.15 (0.60–2.19) 0.661
Dry field farming yes 110 (64.3) 44 (77.2) 66 (57.9) 2.46 (1.19–5.06) 0.013
Work related to cultivation of fruit trees yes 22 (12.9) 10 (17.5) 12 (10.5) 1.80 (0.73–4.48) 0.196
vinyl greenhouse farming yes 5 (2.9) 3 (5.3) 2 (1.8) 3.11 (0.50–19.17) 0.199
Livestock industry (breeding cattle, goat, and chicken) yes 34 (19.9) 16 (28.1) 18 (15.8) 2.08 (0.96–4.47) 0.058

* OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval. Matched by age, gender, and residential area.