Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 1;15(6):1135. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061135

Table 3.

Associations between spatial variables and workplace step count per hour.

Simple Models Adjusted Models
B 95% CI p B 95% CI p
Mean distance to office destinations (excl. workstations)
    All destinations on floor (metres) −4.36 −6.80, −1.92 0.001 −4.66 −8.12, −1.12 0.009
    All destinations on floor (edges) −9.77 −16.11, −3.43 0.003 −9.08 −17.81, −0.35 0.042
    Nearest destinations (metres) −7.80 −12.67, −2.93 0.002 −6.45 −11.88, −0.41 0.036
    Nearest destinations (edges) −21.20 −34.05, −8.35 0.001 −17.32 −32.66, −1.97 0.027
Mean distance to workstations on floor
    All workstations on floor (metres) −3.29 −5.74, −0.822 0.009 −3.02 −6.53, 0.501 0.091
    All workstations on floor (edges) −7.42 −13.71, −1.13 0.021 −5.28 −13.94, 3.38 0.229
Visibility of other workstations
    Visibility standing −2.26 −3.33, −1.16 0.001 −2.35 −3.53, −1.18 <0.000
    Visibility sitting −3.47 −11.07, 4.13 0.368 −4.48 −13.25, 4.24 0.314
Workstation ‘closeness centrality’
    Closeness (turns) −62.40 −113.39, −11.39 0.017 −47.31 −102.65, 8.03 0.093
    Closeness (angular deviation) −0.44 −1.02, 0.14 0.132 −0.31 −0.94, 0.32 0.331

Simple models: univariate associations between IV (spatial metric) and DV (workplace step count per hour). Adjusted models: associations between IV, DV adjusted for organisation, participant age, sex, job role, BMI, ethnicity, perceived management discouragement of breaks. Bold typeface indicates significance at p < 0.05.