Table 6.
Comparison of adsorption capacity of MSG60 and MSG20I30 with others similar ones found in the literature.
| Sample | T (°C)/pCO2 (bar) | Amine, N Content (mmol/g) | CO2 Uptake (mmol/g) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBA-15 | 60/0.15 | APTES, 1.89 | 1.06 | [54] |
| SBA-15 | 60/0.15 | APTES, 2.70 | 0.52 | [55] |
| SBA-15 | 60/0.15 | APTES, 2.61 | 0.66 | [32] |
| CC * | 45/0.25 | MAP, 2.63 | 0.87 | [56] |
| MCM-41 | 45/0.25 | MAP, 3.42 | 1.10 | [56] |
| MSG20 | 50, 75/0.15 | APTES, 2.46 | 0.59/0.44 | This work |
| SBA-15 | 45/1 | APTES/PEI, 7.64 | 2.52 | [22] |
| SBA-15 | 45/1 | APTES/TEPA, 7.92 | 3.16 | [57] |
| SBA-15 | 45/1 | APTES/PEI, 7.00 | 1.88 | [57] |
| PQCS2129 ** | 50,80/0.15 | APTES/PEI,7.50 | 2.91/2.31 | [58] |
| MSG20I30 | 50, 75/1 | APTES/PEI, 7.59 | 2.1/2.61 | This work |
* Commercial Silica gel; ** Commercial Silica support.