Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cyst Fibros. 2018 Feb 1;17(4):528–535. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2018.01.006

EARLY LIFE GROWTH PATTERNS PERSIST FOR 12 YEARS AND IMPACT PULMONARY OUTCOMES IN CYSTIC FIBROSIS

Don B Sanders a,*, Zhumin Zhang b, Philip M Farrell c,d, HuiChuan J Lai b,c,d, on behalf of the Wisconsin CF Neonatal Screening Group
PMCID: PMC6026029  NIHMSID: NIHMS940022  PMID: 29396025

Abstract

Background

In children with cystic fibrosis (CF), recovery from growth faltering within 2 years of diagnosis (Responders) is associated with better growth and less lung disease at age 6 years. This study examined whether these benefits are sustained through 12 years of age.

Methods

Longitudinal growth from 76 children with CF enrolled in the Wisconsin CF Neonatal Screening Project was examined and categorized into 5 groups: R12, R6, and R2, representing Responders who maintained growth improvement to age 12, 6, and 2 years, respectively, and I6 and N6, representing Non-responders whose growth did and did not improve during ages 2–6 years, respectively. Lung disease was evaluated by % predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and chest radiograph (CXR) scores.

Results

Sixty-two percent were Responders. Within this group, 47% were R12, 28% were R6, and 25% were R2. Among Non-responders, 76% were N6. CF children with meconium ileus (MI) had worse lung function and CXR scores compared to other CF children. Among 53 children with pancreatic insufficiency without MI, R12 had significantly better FEV1 (97–99% predicted) and CXR scores during ages 6–12 years than N6 (89–93% predicted). Both R6 and R2 experienced a decline in FEV1 by ages 10–12 years.

Conclusions

Early growth recovery in CF is critical, as malnutrition during infancy tends to persist and catch-up growth after age 2 years is difficult. The longer adequate growth was maintained after early growth recovery, the better the pulmonary outcomes at age 12 years.

Keywords: growth, growth faltering, catch-up growth, pulmonary function, quantitative chest radiography, lung disease

INTRODUCTION

The associations between nutrition and pulmonary status in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) have been reported.19 The positive association between better nutritional status in early life and better lung function in later years has led to the development of CF clinical practice guidelines for comprehensive nutrition management,10 in hopes of delaying progression of lung disease. The introduction of widespread newborn screening (NBS) for CF offers an opportunity to treat and prevent malnutrition.1113 However, almost half of U.S. infants still demonstrate some degree of malnutrition in the first months of life.14

The present study represents the third of a series of Responder studies we conducted over the past decade. Responder I utilized an innovative concept of early weight recovery to define treatment responders within 2 years of diagnosis in infants with CF and identified factors associated with the likelihood of being Responders.15 Responder II examined whether Responders achieved better pulmonary status at 6 years of age when reliable pulmonary function data can be obtained in the majority of children with CF. We demonstrated that Responders had fewer cough symptoms, better lung function, and better chest radiograph scores at age 6 years compared to Non-responders.8

It is unknown if pulmonary benefits associated with early growth recovery experienced by the Responders are sustained beyond age 6 years. The present study, Responder III, was designed to fill in this gap of knowledge. Specifically, we examined: 1) whether Responders who maintained adequate growth during ages 2–6 years continued to do so through age 12 years, 2) whether Non-responders continue to follow their respective growth trajectories during ages 6–12 years, and 3) the impact of growth during ages 6–12 years on pulmonary status at age 12 years in Responders and Non-responders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Population

The study population included 76 children with CF who were enrolled in the Wisconsin Randomized Clinical Trial of CF Neonatal Screening Project (WI-RCT) and had complete growth data and valid pulmonary function data through 12 years of age. The WI RCT is a prospective longitudinal investigation initiated in 1985 to assess the benefits and risks of NBS for CF.13,16 Briefly, randomization of newborns occurred from 4/15/85 until 6/30/94; for half of the randomly assigned newborns, early diagnosis of CF was established through NBS, while the diagnosis of CF in newborns randomized to the control arm was generally established through signs and symptoms of CF. Longitudinal follow-up of the WI RCT cohort continued through 2011 until the youngest patient reached 17 years of age. The WI RCT was approved by the human subjects committee at the University of Wisconsin and the Research and Publications Committee/Human Rights Board at Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin.

A total of 138 children were enrolled in the WI RCT.12 The Responder I study included 100 children who had complete data on growth, plasma fatty acid and dietary data in the first 2 years of life with analyses focused on the subgroup of 80 subjects who had pancreatic insufficiency (PI) but no meconium ileus (MI).15 The Responder II study included 91 children (9 children lost to follow up during 2–6 years of age)8 and the present study (Responder III) included 76 children (15 children lost to follow up during 6–12 years of age).

Growth assessment and definition of responders

Weight, recumbent length before age 2 years and standing height after age 2 years were measured every 3 months.11,12 Age- and sex-specific z-scores for weight (WTz), length/height (HTz) and body mass index (BMIz) were computed by using the 2000 CDC growth charts,17 which were used in our Responder I and II studies and the recommended growth references for all ages before the CDC and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended WHO growth charts for age 0–2 years in 2010 and 2012.18, 19 In addition, by using the CDC charts in the present Responder III study, we avoided the discrepancies that would have been encountered when switching between growth charts at age 24 months, which we recently described.20

Responders were defined by recovery from malnutrition and growth faltering resulting from untreated CF as indicated by catch-up weight gain to the level comparable to their birth weight z-score within 2 years of diagnosis.15 The rationale for this approach is based on findings that birth weights in infants with CF were similar21, 22 or only slightly lower22, 23 than those of healthy infants, but a large percentage of CF children fall below the 5th percentile by the time of diagnosis.21, 22, 24 In addition, physical growth of infants and young children varies greatly due to intrauterine, genetic and nutritional influences. Therefore, recovery of weight to a level comparable to one’s birth weight z-score represents a more individualized indicator of treatment responsiveness than using a common reference level (such as weight > 5th or 10th percentile) for all children with CF.

Classification of growth patterns during 2–6 and 6–12 years of age

Growth pattern during age 2–6 years was evaluated using HTz and BMIz.8 WTz was not used to define growth pattern because WTz is influenced by both age and height. For example, a child may have a low WTz because he or she is short for age and not because of a low weight for height. On the other hand, BMIz is an independent indicator of weight for height proportion, thus provides a complimentary measure to HTz.

The cumulative changes in HTz and BMIz during age 2–6 years (i.e., ΔHTz and ΔBMIz) were estimated using linear regression for each subject (i.e., slope multiplied by the 4-year interval). Thereafter, ΔHTz and ΔBMIz were evaluated relative to a one-channel difference (equivalent to approximately 0.67 Z-score) on the respective CDC growth charts.8 As illustrated in Figure 1, Responders whose ΔHTz and/or ΔBMIz increased or remained stable during ages 2–6 years were classified as “maintained” while Responders whose ΔHTz and/or ΔBMIz declined were classified as “not maintained”. On the other hand, Non-responders whose ΔHTz and/or ΔBMIz increased during ages 2–6 years were classified as “improved”, while Non-responders whose ΔHTz and ΔBMIz remained stable or declined during age 2–6 years were classified as “not improved.”

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Classification of growth patterns through 12 years of age. Responders recovered birth weight z-scores within 2 years of diagnosis while Non-responders did not. R12, R6, and R2 maintained growth improvement to age 12, 6 and 2 years, respectively. I6 had growth improvement during age 2–6 years while N6 did not. (50)

The above process was repeated for ages 6–12 years, resulting in 8 possible subgroups (Figure 1). However, 3 subgroups had fewer than 5 patients. Therefore, we categorized growth patterns through age 12 years into 5 groups: 3 Responder groups (R12, R6, and R2, representing Responders who maintained growth improvement to age 12, 6, and 2 years, respectively) and 2 Non-responder groups (I6: Non-responders whose growth improved during 2–6 years of age and N6: Non-responders whose growth did not improve during 2–6 years of age).

Pulmonary outcome measures at ages 6–12 years

Pulmonary function tests (PFT) were performed every 6 months beginning at age 4 years for the purpose of familiarizing and training young children with CF on this test, as described in detail previously.25 Only data validated with the Pediatric Alternate Spirometry System and/or ATS criteria were included,25 and the percentage of PFT measurements in children younger than 5.5 years did not differ significantly between Responders (6.2%) and Non-Responders (7.0%). Percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were calculated using equations from Wang et al.26 Chest radiographs obtained at diagnosis, 2 and 4 years of age, and annually thereafter were scored using the Brasfield system24 and the Wisconsin system25, 28, 29 by two raters (a pediatric pulmonologist and a thoracic radiologist). A total of 580 FEV1 measurements (7.6 ± 3.3 per patient) and 521 chest radiographs (6.9 ± 1.4 per patient) were analyzed.

Statistical Analysis

Analysis of variance was used to compare means when the data were normally distributed, and nonparametric analysis of variance was used when the data were skewed. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare categorical variables as appropriate. For longitudinal analyses, mixed effects models were used to evaluate the associations between growth and pulmonary outcomes with Responder status while adjusting for sex, diagnosis by NBS and birth weight z-scores. SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC) and R (www.rproject.org) were used for data processing and statistical analyses. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

In consistent with Responder I and II studies,8,15 all analyses that compared growth and pulmonary outcomes were stratified or conducted separately by gastrointestinal phenotype, on the basis of the following rationale: 1) PS patients are at lower risk of malnutrition and are able to achieve normal growth (i.e., mean weight- and length-for-age at approximately the 50th percentile) with energy intake at 99% of their recommended requirement,12 and 2) MI patients have been shown to experience poorer growth despite a higher energy intake than patients without MI with a similar age at diagnosis and treatment protocol.30

RESULTS

Characteristics of the study population

Table 1 compares the characteristics of the study populations across the three Responder studies. The 76 children with CF included in Responder III is a subset of children who completed follow-up to 12 years of age and had valid PFT measurements. Consistent with the Responder I and Responder II studies,8,15 Responders had significantly lower birth weights but higher height z-scores and BMI z-scores at 2 years of age compared to Non-responders. None of the characteristics shown in Table 1 differ significantly across the 3 Responder studies.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of responders and non-responders

Responder I (N=100, ref 15) Responder II (N=91, ref 8) Responder III (N=76, this study)
Responder Non-Responder Responder Non-Responder Responder Non-Responder
Number of subjects 61 39 56 35 47 29
Male, n (%) 33 (54%) 24 (62%) 30 (54%) 22 (63%) 25 (53%) 16 (55%)
Age at diagnosis in months
mean ± SD 3.4 ± 5.4 2.2 ± 2.7 3.6 ± 5.6 2.0 ± 2.7 4.0 ± 6.0 2.1 ± 2.9
median 1.8 1.6 1.8 1.6 1.9 1.6
Diagnosed by newborn screening, n (%) 42 (69%) 20 (51%) 37 (66%) 19 (54%) 29 (62%) 15 (52%)
CFTR genotype, n (%)
F508del/F508del 38 (62%) 22 (56%) 34 (61%) 22 (63%) 28 (60%) 17 (59%)
F508del/Other 20 (33%) 15 (38%) 19 (34%) 12 (34%) 17 (36%) 11 (38%)
Other/Other 3 (5%) 2 (5%) 3 (5%) 1 (3%) 2 (4%) 1 (3%)
Gastrointestinal phenotype, n (%)
Meconium ileus (MI) 12 (20%) 11 (28%) 11 (20%) 11 (31%) 7 (15%) 10 (34%)
No MI but Pancreatic Insufficient (PI) 45 (74%) 26 (67%) 41 (73%) 22 (63%) 36 (77%) 17 (59%)
Pancreatic Sufficient (PS) 4 (6%) 2 (5%) 4 (7%) 2 (6%) 4 (8%) 2 (7%)
Birth weight, mean ± SD
kg 3.22 ± 0.36 3.46 ± 0.45* 3.21 ± 0.36 3.49 ± 0.45* 3.21 ± 0.37 3.49 ± 0.47
z-score −0.46 ± 0.65 0.0 ± 0.86* −0.48 ± 0.65 0.07 ± 0.87* −0.47 ± 0.37 0.08 ± 0.91
Growth at age 2 years, mean ± SD
Height z-score −0.06 ± 0.95 −0.90 ± 0.83* −0.03 ± 0.92 −0.87 ± 0.83* 0.07 ± 0.91 −0.88 ± 0.85*
BMI z-score 0.40 ± 0.93 −0.36 ± 0.76* 0.36 ± 0.95 −0.36 ± 0.77* 0.44 ± 0.93 −0.33 ± 0.84*
*

p<0.05 compared to responders within each study. No significant differences were found across the 3 responder studies.

Growth patterns during 6–12 years of age in relation to prior growth and Responder status

Figure 1 shows that 62% (47 out of 76 CF children) were Responders. About three-quarters of the Responders (35 out of 47) followed their growth trajectories and maintained their growth improvement during 2–6 years; about two-thirds of the latter (22 out of 35) sustained the improvement to 12 years of age (R12), while the other one-third (13 out of 35) only maintained growth improvement to 6 years of age (R6). About a quarter of Responders (12 out of 47) did not maintain their growth improvement beyond 2 years of age (R2). Among Non-responders, about three-quarters (22 out of 29) followed their growth trajectories and did not improve during 2–6 years (N6); moreover, 90% of N6 (20 out of 22) had no further improvement during 6–12 years. Only a quarter of Non-responders (7 out of 29) had improved growth during 2–6 years (I6), and none of them maintained the improvement through 12 years of age. These data demonstrate that growth patterns established early in life tend to persist and determine subsequent growth trajectories. Overall, of the 76 children with CF included in this study, 29% were R12, 17% R6, 16% R2, 9% I6 and 29% N6.

Growth and pulmonary status during 6–12 years of age by gastrointestinal phenotype

As shown in Figure 2, the MI subgroup had significantly lower height z-scores than the PI (p=0.014) and PS (p=0.005) groups, and significantly lower BMI scores than the PS group (p=0.003). Compared to the PS group, the PI group did not differ significantly in height z-scores (p=0.13), but their BMI z-scores were lower (p=0.028).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of growth during ages 6–12 years by gastrointestinal phenotype. MI: meconium ileus; PI: pancreatic insufficiency without MI; PS: pancreatic sufficiency. Differences among 3 phenotypes were assessed by mixed effects models adjusting for sex, birth weight z-score and diagnosis by NBS; arrows with * indicate pairwise comparisons with p<0.05. (49)

Differences in height and BMI were also reflected in different Responder rates across the three phenotypes. The percentage of R12 was lowest in MI (12%), followed by PI (32%) and highest in PS (50%), while the percentage of N6 was higher in MI (47%) compared to PI (23%) and PS (33%). However, these differences did not reach statistical significance, most likely due to the small sample size of the PS group (n=6).

Regarding pulmonary outcomes, Figure 3 shows that FEV1 was significantly lower and declined at a faster rate during age 6–12 years in MI compared to PI (p=0.008) and PS (p=0.024). Wisconsin CXR scores were also worst in MI, but the differences were only significant compared with PI.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of pulmonary status during ages 6–12 years by gastrointestinal phenotype (see Figure 1 legend for abbreviations). Differences among 3 phenotypes were assessed by mixed effects models adjusting for sex, birth weight z-score and diagnosis by NBS; arrows with * indicate pairwise comparisons with p<0.05. (47)

These results provide evidence to support our previous approach in Responder I and II studies8,15 that delineating growth-pulmonary relationships in CF is best conducted by separate analysis for each phenotype, because differences in growth and pulmonary outcomes are not uniform across phenotypes, making it difficult to satisfactorily adjust the confounding by phenotype. Due to small sample sizes for the MI and PS groups and to provide comparison with Responder I and II studies,8,15 we conducted the remaining analyses below within the PI group only.

Growth and pulmonary status during 6–12 years of age in the PI group

Figure 4 shows that the three Responder groups (R12, R6 and R2) had significantly higher height z-scores than the two Non-responder groups (N6 and I6), p < 0.01 for all pairwise comparisons. Smaller differences in BMI z-scores were observed, but significant differences were observed in R12 and R6 compared to N6 and R2, p < 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons. The major difference between I6 and N6 is that the I6 group was very short (mean height z-score <10th percentile) with normal BMI (~60th percentile), while the N6 group was taller (~20th percentile) but had lower BMI (~35th percentile). The I6 group is the shortest among the 5 groups, and their temporary improvement in growth during ages 2–6 years was due to increase in BMI and not in height status.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Comparison of growth during ages 6–12 years in PI patients among R12, R6, R2, N6 and I6 (see Figure 1 legend for abbreviations). Differences were assessed by mixed effects models adjusting for sex, birth weight z-score and diagnosis by NBS; arrows with * indicate pairwise comparisons with p<0.05. (50)

Figure 5 shows that all five groups had mean FEV1 >89%. R12 maintained the highest FEV1 (97–99%) during ages 6–12 years that was consistently higher than N6 (89–93%), p=0.037. Both R6 and R2 had very good FEV1 at 6–8 years but their FEV1 declined around 10–12 years of age. Wisconsin CXR scores revealed increasing severity of lung disease from 6 to 12 years of age in all five groups (Figure 5). This finding supports our previous observation22 that the Wisconsin CXR score is more consistent and sensitive than FEV1 in detecting mild lung disease in young children with CF. R12 had the lowest (i.e., best) CXR scores throughout 6–12 years of age. The CXR scores for R12 were significantly better compared to N6 (p=0.016), I6 (p=0.034) and R6 (p=0.033).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Comparison of pulmonary status during ages 6–12 years in PI patients among R12, R6, R2, N6 and I6 (see Figure 1 legend for abbreviations). Differences were assessed by mixed effects models adjusting for sex, birth weight z-score and diagnosis by NBS; arrows with * indicate pairwise comparisons with p<0.05. (51).

Growth and pulmonary status at 12 years of age in the PI group

Figure 6 shows the associations between growth and pulmonary outcomes at age 12 years. FEV1 and Wisconsin CXR scores mirrored height z-scores, with the three Responder groups (R12, R6 and R2) better than the 2 Non-responder groups (N6 and I6). Overall, R12 had normal height and near normal BMI z-scores and the best FEV1 and Wisconsin CXR scores at age 12 years. This finding suggests that the longer adequate growth is maintained, the better the pulmonary outcomes at age 12 years.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Comparison of growth and pulmonary status at age 12 years in PI patients among R12, R6, R2, N6 and I6 (see Figure 1 legend for abbreviations). Differences were assessed by linear regression adjusting for sex, birth weight z-score and diagnosis by NBS. Pairwise comparisons of all 5 groups were performed, and bars with different alphabet letters are statistically different at p<0.05. (50)

DISCUSSION

Long-term outcome studies after NBS are rare but very much needed and valuable in the CF population. The present study examined growth and pulmonary outcomes more than a decade following diagnosis of CF through NBS in a prospectively followed cohort.12,13 Results from the present study and our previous work8,15 advance our knowledge in understanding growth patterns and their impact on lung disease progression in children with CF and PI from infancy through 12 years of age. Specifically, we demonstrated that growth patterns established early in life tend to persist and determine subsequent growth trajectories. That is, infants with CF and PI who recovered birth weight z-scores by 2 years of age (Responders) are more likely to maintain better height and BMI z-scores through 12 years of age, while Non-responders are more likely to continue sub-optimal growth. Most noteworthy is that in our study cohort, none of the Non-responders achieved further catch-up growth consistently during 2–12 years. Temporary improvements in BMI were achieved for a minority of patients (n=7 during age 2–6 but not 6–12 years, and n=2 during age 6–12 but not 2–6 years), although height z-scores remained low. This illustrates how difficult it is to attain catch-up growth after the first 2 years of life, when growth rate is the highest during the life span. Our results are consistent with a recent report by Heltshe et al who showed that weight for age as early as 4 months of life appears to predict growth at 2 years of age.14

The most important clinical implication resulting from our findings is that, in children with CF and PI, early response (recovery of birth weight z-scores within 2 years of diagnosis) is not only essential in setting the foundation for future growth trajectory but also critical in increasing the likelihood of achieving better structural and functional lung disease at age 6 years.8 However, in the present Responder III study, we found that the pulmonary benefit experienced by Responders at age 6 years were lessened at 12 years of age. That is, achieving Responder status at age 2 years alone is not sufficient to sustain normal lung function through 12 years of age: maintaining growth improvement through age 12 years is also needed. For example, our data in Figures 5 and 6 showed that both R2 and R6 had good FEV1 and CXR scores at 6 years, yet only R12 sustained normal measurements of FEV1 (and had the smallest worsening in CXR scores) from 6 to 12 years. Temporary growth improvement in BMI but not height status, as was observed in the I6 group, was accompanied by transient increases in FEV1 that were not sustained at age 12 years and worsening CXR scores during 6–12 years of age.

An unanswered question is whether one can predict which infants would be Non-Responders (approximately one out of three infants) and which Non-Responders would continue growth faltering through 6 years of age (approximately three out of four Non-Responders), as well as which Responders will not maintain growth improvement beyond 2 years of age (approximately one out of four Responders), in order to intervene early with more aggressive nutrition therapy. Definitive answers to this question would be extremely difficult to obtain, as randomized clinical trials with multiple arms to test each potential determinant over 12 years are not feasible. In our Responder I study,15 early diagnosis through NBS with less severe malnutrition and pulmonary disease at the time of diagnosis, in conjunction with high dietary intakes of calories (at >120% of estimated requirement) and higher plasma levels of linoleic acid (the principle essential fatty acid) were found to increase the likelihood of being Responders. We concluded that frequent monitoring of plasma linoleic acid through assessment of plasma essential fatty acid profile is necessary and should be implemented in routine clinical care.15 However, current practice guidelines from the US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation10, 31, 32 still conclude that no sufficient evidence is present to recommend for or against essential fatty acid supplementation and that more research is needed. In our Responder II study,8 we found that Responders maintained adequate growth through age 6 years despite lower caloric intake than Non-responders. This is likely due to the fact that poor growth in Non-responders prompted increase in caloric supplementation in order to promote catch-up growth, while Responders only needed to ingest sufficient calories to maintain current growth. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection reduced the likelihood of being a Responder,15 but was not significantly associated with subsequent growth patterns during 2–6 years8 or 6–12 years of age (data not shown). By age 12 years, 43 of 47 Non-Responders and 25 of 29 Responders had at least one recorded culture positive for Pseudomonas. We did not observe significant differences in Pseudomonas infections between Responders and Non-Responders. This may be due, at least partially, that very few subjects were never positive for Pseudomonas by 12 years of age.

Our study has two limitations. First, the sample size is relatively small, which limits our ability to perform subgroup comparisons or to adjust for potential confounders. Studies with large sample size are needed to validate our findings, especially for Non-responders with growth improvement at ages 2–6 years (the I6 group) and to investigate more in-depth in MI and PS patients. Second, our studies are observational, therefore, our findings on the impact of growth on pulmonary outcomes do not imply causality. Instead, it’s likely that associations are bidirectional, i.e., better growth leads to better pulmonary outcomes and vice versa.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this long-term outcome study provide clear evidence that in infants with CF, early nutritional response (recovery of birth weight z-scores within 2 years of diagnosis) determines subsequent growth trajectories and increases the likelihood of achieving better growth, better lung function and less severe chest radiographic abnormalities through 12 years of age. Further studies are needed to identify optimal CF interventions that can maximize the chance for achieving early growth recovery, as catch-up growth after infancy is difficult to attain.

Acknowledgments

Funding Source: All phases of this study were supported by NIH grants R01DK072126 and R01DK034108, and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation grant SANDERS11A0.

We thank all the members of the Wisconsin Cystic Fibrosis Neonatal Screening Project team, including:

Jeff Douglas, PhD, Norman Fost, MD, MPH, Christopher Green, MD, Ronald Gregg, PhD, Michael Kosorok, PhD, Ronald Laessig, PhD, Zhanhai Li, PhD, Mari Palta, PhD, Michael Rock, MD, Margie Rosenberg, PhD, Audrey Tluzcek, PhD, L. J. Wei, PhD, Susan West, PhD, and Benjamin Wilfond, MD (University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison); and W. Theodore Bruns, MD, William Gershan, MD, Elaine Mischler, MD, Mark Splaingard, MD, and Lee Rusakow (Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee). The study was coordinated and managed superbly on a day-to-day basis at both sites by Anita Laxova. In addition, the group includes outstanding teams of biostatisticians (Rebecca Koscik, Sharon Shen, and Lan Zeng), nurses (Karen Moucha, Miriam Block, Holly Colby, Lynn Feenan, Mary Ellen Freeman, Catherine McCarthy, and Darci Pfeil), nutritionists (Lisa Davis, Mary Marcus, and Tami Miller), and the outstanding laboratory leaders of the Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene’s newborn screening program (David Hassamer and Gary Hoffman).

Abbreviations

BMIz

Age- and sex-specific z-scores for body mass index

CF

Cystic fibrosis

CXR

Chest radiograph

FEV1

Forced expiratory volume in 1 second

HTz

Age- and sex-specific z-scores for length (< 2 years) or height (≥ 2 years)

I6

Non-responders whose growth improved during 2–6 years of age

MI

Meconium ileus

N6

Non-responders whose growth did not improve during 2–6 years of age

NBS

Newborn screening

PFT

Pulmonary function tests

PI

Pancreatic insufficiency

PS

Pancreatic sufficiency

R6

Responders who maintained their growth through 6 years of age

R12

Responders who maintained their growth through 12 years of age

WI RCT

Wisconsin Randomized Clinical Trial of CF Newborn Screening

WTz

Age- and sex-specific z-scores for weight

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Data from this manuscript was presented at the 2012 North American Cystic Fibrosis Conference in Orlando, USA, and the 2017 European Cystic Fibrosis Conference in Seville, Spain.

Financial Disclosure: DBS and PMF report consulting work with and grant funding from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. HJL reports grant funding from the NIH and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. ZZ has no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Corey M, McLaughlin F, Williams M, Levison H. A comparison of survival, growth, and pulmonary function in patients with cystic fibrosis in Boston and Toronto. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(6):583–591. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90063-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pedreira C, Robert R, Dalton V, Oliver M, Carlin J, Robinson P, et al. Association of body composition and lung function in children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2005;39(3):276–280. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Konstan M, Morgan W, Butler S, Pasta D, Craib M, Silva S, et al. Risk factors for rate of decline in forced expiratory volume in one second in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. 2007;151(2):134–139. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zemel B, Jawad A, FitzSimmons S, Stallings V. Longitudinal relationship among growth, nutritional status, and pulmonary function in children with cystic fibrosis: analysis of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation National CF Patient Registry. J Pediatr. 2000;137(3):374–380. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2000.107891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Peterson ML, Jacobs DR, Milla CE. Longitudinal changes in growth parameters are correlated with changes in pulmonary function in children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatrics. 2003;112(3):588–592. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.3.588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sanders DB, Li Z, Laxova A, Rock MJ, Levy H, Collins J, et al. Risk Factors for the Progression of Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease throughout Childhood. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(1):63–72. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201309-303OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Konstan M, Butler S, Wohl M, Stoddard M, Matousek R, Wagener J, et al. Growth and nutritional indexes in early life predict pulmonary function in cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. 2003;142(6):624–630. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2003.152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lai H, Shoff S, Farrell P, Wisconsin CF. Neonatal Screening Group. Recovery of birth weight z score within 2 years of diagnosis is positively associated with pulmonary status at 6 years of age in children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatrics. 2009;123(2):714–722. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sanders DB, Fink A, Mayer-Hamblett N, Schechter MS, Sawicki GS, Rosenfeld M, et al. Early Life Growth Trajectories in Cystic Fibrosis are Associated with Pulmonary Function at Age 6 Years. J Pediatr. 2015;167(5):1081–1088. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.07.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stallings VA, Stark LJ, Robinson KA, Feranchak AP, Quinton H, et al. Subcommittee CPGoGaN. Evidence-based practice recommendations for nutrition-related management of children and adults with cystic fibrosis and pancreatic insufficiency: results of a systematic review. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108(5):832–839. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Farrell P, Kosorok M, Laxova A, Shen G, Koscik R, Bruns W, et al. Nutritional benefits of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(14):963–969. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710023371403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Farrell P, Kosorok M, Rock M, Laxova A, Zeng L, Lai H, et al. Early diagnosis of cystic fibrosis through neonatal screening prevents severe malnutrition and improves long-term growth. Pediatrics. 2001;107(1):1–13. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Farrell PM. Improving the health of patients with cystic fibrosis through newborn screening. Adv Pediatr. 2000;47:79–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Heltshe SL, Borowitz DS, Leung DH, Ramsey B, Mayer-Hamblett N. Early attained weight and length predict growth faltering better than velocity measures in infants with CF. J Cyst Fibros. 2014;13(6):723–729. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2014.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shoff S, Ahn H, Davis L, Lai H, Wisconsin CF. Neonatal Screening Group. Temporal associations among energy intake, plasma linoleic acid, and growth improvement in response to treatment initiation after diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Pediatrics. 2006;117(2):391–400. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Farrell PM, Aronson RA, Hoffman G, Laessig RH. Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis in Wisconsin: first application of population-based molecular genetics testing. Wis Med J. 1994;93(8):415–421. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kuczmarski R, Ogden C, Guo S, et al. 2000 CDC growth charts for theUnited States: methods and development. Vital health stat. 2002;246:1–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Grummer-Strawn LM, Reinold C, Krebs NF Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use of World Health Organization and CDC growth charts for children aged 0–59 months in the United States. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59(RR-9):1–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.American Acedemy of Pediatrics. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2012;129(3):e827–841. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang Z, Shoff S, Lai H. Comparing the Use of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and World Health Organization Growth Charts in Children with Cystic Fibrosis through 2 Years of Age. J Pediatr. 2015;167(5):1089–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.07.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pederzini F, D’Orazio C, Tamiazzo G, et al. Growth evaluation at one year of life in infants with cystic fibrosis diagnosed by neotatal screening. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1991;7(suppl):64–68. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950110713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bronstein M, Sokol R, Abman S, et al. Pancreatic insufficiency, growth, and nutrition in infants identified by newborn screening as having cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. 1992;120(4):533–540. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)82478-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Marcus M, Sondel S, Farrell P, et al. Nutritional status of infants with cystic fibrosis associated with early diagnosis and intervention. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;54(3):578–585. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/54.3.578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lai H, Kosorok M, Sondel S, Chen S, FitzSimmons S, Green C, et al. Growth status in children with cystic fibrosis based on the National Cystic Fibrosis Patient Registry data: evaluation of various criteria used to identify malnutrition. J Pediatr. 1998;132(3):478–485. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70024-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Farrell P, Li Z, Kosorok M, Laxova A, Green C, Collins J, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of bronchopulmonary disease in children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2003;36(3):230–240. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang X, Dockery D, Wypij D, Fay M, Ferris BJ. Pulmonary function between 6 and 18 years of age. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1993;15(2):75–88. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950150204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Brasfield D, Hicks G, Soong S, Tiller R. The chest roentgenogram in cystic fibrosis: a new scoring system. Pediatrics. 1979;63(1):24–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Weatherly M, Palmer C, Peters M, Green C, Fryback D, Langhough R, et al. Wisconsin cystic fibrosis chest radiograph scoring system. Pediatrics. 1993;91(2):488–495. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Koscik R, Kosorok M, Farrell P, Collins J, Peters M, Laxova A, et al. Wisconsin cystic fibrosis chest radiograph scoring system: validation and standardization for application to longitudinal studies. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2000;29(6):457–467. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(200006)29:6<457::aid-ppul8>3.0.co;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lai HC, Kosorok MR, Laxova A, Davis LA, FitzSimmon SC, Farrell PM. Nutritional status of patients with cystic fibrosis with meconium ileus: a comparison with patients without meconium ileus and diagnosed early through neonatal screening. Pediatrics. 2000;105(1 Pt 1):53–61. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.1.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Borowitz D, Baker RD, Stallings V. Consensus report on nutrition for pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol & Nutr. 2002;35(3):246–259. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200209000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Borowitz D, Robinson KA, Rosenfeld M, Davis SD, Sabadosa KA, Spear SL, Michel SH, Parad RB, White TB, Farrell MP, Marshall BC, Accurso FJ. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation evidence-based guidelines for management of infants with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. 2009;155(6 Supp):S73–S93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES