Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Anesth Analg. 2019 Feb;128(2):288–295. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002794

Table 2.

Primary and Secondary Outcomes in the Propensity-Matched Cohort

No Platelet Transfusion
(N=985)
Platelet Transfusion
(N=985)
Outcome Event (%) Event (%) OR (95% CI) p-value
 RBC transfusion within 24 hours 102 (10.4%) 456 (46.3%) 7.5 (5.9, 9.5) <0.001
 ICU mortality 90 (9.1%) 101 (10.3%) 1.1 (0.8, 1.5) 0.403
 All-cause 30-day mortality 162 (16.4%) 184 (18.7%) 1.2 (0.9, 1.5) 0.193

Outcome Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean Rate Ratio (95% CI) p-value
 ICU-free days 22.7 (8.3) 20.8 (9.1) 0.9 (0.9, 1.0) 0.004
 Hospital-free days 15.8 (9.4) 13.0 (9.7) 0.8 (0.7, 0.9) <0.001

Outcome Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean Difference (95% CI)§ p-value§
 Change in SOFA score* −1.8 (3.3) −0.2 (3.6) 1.5 (1.2, 1.8) <0.001

CI – confidence interval, ICU – intensive care unit, RBC – red blood cell, SOFA – sequential organ failure assessment, SD – standard deviation.

Estimate and p-value comes from logistic regression. An odds ratio > 1 implies increased odds for the outcome in those receiving platelet transfusions.

Estimate and p-value comes from negative binomial regression. A rate ratio < 1 implies decreased mean for the outcome in those receiving platelet transfusions. Specifically, a rate ratio of 0.9 can be interpreted as a 10% decrease in the mean for those receiving platelet transfusions compared to those who did not.

*

Change in SOFA score defined as 24-hr SOFA score – Baseline SOFA score, with negative values reflecting improvement in SOFA scores in the ensuing 24 hours.

§

Estimate and p-value comes from linear regression. A mean difference > 0 implies less improvement in SOFA score in those receiving platelet transfusions.