Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 29;8:9846. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28253-9

Table 2.

Correlation between LOXL2 expression and clinicopathological factors.

Low LOXL2 (n = 46) High LOXL2 (n = 124) P value
Age (≥65 vs <65 years) 14/32 70/54 <0.01
Gender (male vs female) 28/18 74/50 1
Tumor location (head vs body/tail) 10/34 95/26 0.81
CEA (≥5 ng/mL vs <5 ng/mL) 9/36 38/85 0.28
CA19-9 (≥100 U/mL vs <100 U/mL) 24/22 80/44 0.14
Tumor size (≥32 mm vs <32 mm) 33/13 100/22 0.19
Peritoneal washing cytology (positive vs negative) 8/36 19/103 0.56
Portal vein invasion (positive vs negative) 21/25 81/43 0.02
Perineural invasion (positive vs negative) 8/38 38/86 0.12
Lymph node metastasis (positive vs negative) 30/16 99/25 0.68
Stage IA/IB/IIA/IIB/IV 2/0/13/20/11 2/2/18/68/34 0.17
Recurrence site (peritoneum/liver/local/lung/lymph node/others) 5/9/13/2/9/1 31/34/46/5/19/2 0.04
EMT (mesenchymal vs epithelial) 9/37 78/46 <0.01

Abbreviations, CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; EMT, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; LOXL2; lysyl oxidase-like protein 2.