Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 29;8:9846. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28253-9

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of DFS.

Univariate Multivariate
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Age (≥65 vs <65 years) 1.10 (0.72–1.70) 0.65
Gender (male vs female) 1.20 (0.78–1.86) 0.4
Tumor location (head vs body/tail) 2.06 (1.19–3.73) <0.01 1.07 (0.29–2.79) 0.1
CEA (≥5 ng/mL vs <5 ng/mL) 1.03 (0.65–1.64) 0.89
CA19–9 (≥100 U/mL vs <100 U/mL) 1.13 (0.73–1.74) 0.56
Tumor size (≥20 mm vs <20 mm) 1.85 (1.06–3.40) 0.03 1.89 (1.15–3.31) 0.03
Peritoneal washing cytology (positive vs negative) 1.87 (0.83–4.20) 0.13
Portal vein invasion (positive vs negative) 1.03 (0.66–1.60) 0.9
Perineural invasion (positive vs negative) 1.29 (0.81–2.05) 0.28
Lymph node metastasis (positive vs negative) 1.73 (0.47–6.33) 0.41
UICC Stage IA/IB/IIA/IIB/IV 1.95 (1.02–3.74) 0.05
EMT (mesenchymal vs epithelial) 2.13 (1.35–3.42) <0.01 2.23 (1.45–3.49) <0.01
LOXL2 expression 1.89 (1.12–3.26) 0.02 1.88 (1.16–3.15) <0.01

Abbreviations, CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; EMT, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; LOXL2, lysyl oxidase-like protein 2; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.