Skip to main content
. 2017 May 5;152(3):494–501. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.04.174

Table 2.

Effect of dFEV1 on the Absolute Difference in Exacerbation Rates

Inclusion No. of Trials No. of Comparisons No. of Subjects Slope (b)
Estimate (95% CI)
RR = Exp(b)
Estimate (95% CI)
P R2
All studies 94 167 119,227 –0.16 (–0.21 to –0.1) 0.86 (0.81 to 0.91) < .001 0.20
Only two arms 49 49 45,371 –0.19 (–0.31 to –0.07) 0.82 (0.73 to 0.93) .002 0.24
BD only 49 76 80,718 –0.23 (–0.31 to –0.16) 0.79 (0.73 to 0.86) < .001 0.39
ICS only 27 35 32,354 –0.12 (–0.25 to 0.01) 0.89 (0.78 to 1.01) .078 0.18
PDE4 only 13 14 14,523 –0.25 (–0.92 to 0.42) 0.78 (0.4 to 1.52) .463 0.00
Non-BD 57 91 56,715 –0.1 (–0.19 to –0.01) 0.91 (0.83 to 0.99) .036 0.06
≥ 1 Exacerbation in previous year 27 47 31,055 –0.07 (–0.17 to 0.04) 0.93 (0.84 to 1.04) .204 0.00

For this analysis, the model is ln(RR) = a + b*dTreat, where RR = rate ratio. The unit for dTreat unit is 100 mL. See Table 1 legend for expansion of abbreviations.