Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 8;7(2):192–199. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2018.02.006

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Comparison of CK-mB, EF and FS in NLR > 2.76 and NLR > 4 to all patients's data. (A) CK-mB in all patients, NLR > 2.76 and NLR > 4. CK-mB was significantly increased in NLR > 2.76 and in NLR > 4 groups compare to all patients group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, n = 193, n = 112 and n = 715, respectively). CK-mB was greater in NLR > 4 compare to that in NLR > 2.76 (p < 0.003). (B) EF was significantly lower in NLR > 2.76 and NLR > 4 compare to all patients group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.02). EF was not different between NLR > 2.76 and NLR > 4 (p = 0.6). (C) FS was not different among groups (p = 0.4, p = 0.5 and p = 0.2, respectively).