Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 19;114(12):2844–2854. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.04.049

Table 1.

Fitted and Calculated Gating Parameters

QON ITAIL ITAIL-QON
Construct Parameter Mean SE n Mean SE n Difference
VM (mV) −38.9 0.8 6 −31.6 0.8 6 7.3a
W207A-N214R V0.5 (mV) −40.0 1.1 6 −31.4 0.6 6 8.6b
zG (e0) 2.80 0.06 6 3.21 0.11 6 0.41NS
VM (mV) −24.1 0.3 12 −11.3 0.4 12 12.8c
W207A-N214R-ΔC V0.5 (mV) −24.6 0.3 12 −15.7 0.4 12 8.9d
zG (e0) 1.75e 0.01 12 1.52f 0.02 12 −0.23g
VM (mV) 17.8 0.8 3 25.7 1.6 3 8.0NS
R205A-N214R V0.5 (mV) 25.1 2.3 3 26.4 1.3 3 1.3NS
zG (e0) 2.14h 0.12 3 1.89i 0.07 3 −0.25NS

Data represent calculated VM or Boltzmann-fitted V0.5 and parameters for QON-V and ITAIL-V relations measured at pHO 6.5 in the indicated number of cells.

a

W207A-N214R: ITAIL VM vs. QON VM, p = 0.03.

b

W207A-N214R: ITAIL V0.5 vs. QON V0.5, p = 0.02.

c

W207A-N214R-ΔC: ITAIL VM vs. QON VM, p = 1.6 × 10−7.

d

W207A-N214R-ΔC: ITAIL V0.5 vs. QON V0.5, p = 2.2 × 10−5.

e

QONzG: W207A-N214R vs. W207A-N214R-ΔC, p = 2.3 × 10−7.

f

ITAILzG: W207A-N214R vs. W207A-N214R-ΔC, p = 5.6 × 10−7.

g

W207A-N214R-ΔC: ITAILzG vs. QONzG, p = 0.01.

h

QONzG: W207A-N214R vs. R205A-N214R, p = 0.01.

i

ITAILzG: W207A-N214R vs. R205A-N214R, p = 0.02.