Table 1. Comparison of disease scores for Fusarium oxysporum Sch.
| Breeding line ID | A | B | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laboratory score | Genotyping of BvSP2 | Field score | Genotyping of BvSE2 | |
| 1002 | 1*, R | a1a1 | 2–3*, S | a2b2 |
| 1005 | 1–2, R | a1a1 | 2, In | a2b2 |
| 1017 | 0–1, R | a1a1 | 1–2, R | a2b2 |
| 1042 | 2, In | a1a1 | 2–3, S | b2b2 |
| 1082 | 1–2, R | a1a1 | 1, R | a2a2 |
| 2115 | 1–2, R | a1a1 | 1, R | a2a2 |
| 2125 | 2–3, S | b1b1 | 1–2, R | a2a2 |
| 2154 | 2, In | a1a1 | 2–3, S | b2b2 |
| 2172 | 1–2, R | a1a1 | 2, In | a2b2 |
| 2182 | 1, R | a1a1 | 0–1, R | a2a2 |
| 2190 | 1–2, R | a1a1 | 1–2, R | a2a2 |
| 2210 | 2–3*, S | b1b1 | 0–1*, R | a2a2 |
| 2217 | 2, In | a1b1 | 1–2, R | a2b2 |
| 2236 | 1–2*, R | a1a1 | 4*, S | b2b2 |
| 2261 | 1–2, R | a1a1 | 0–1, R | a2a2 |
| 2262 | 1–2, R | a1a1 | 2–3, S | b2b2 |
| 2263 | 2, In | a1b1 | 2, In | a2b2 |
| 2281 | 1–2, R | a1a1 | 1–2, R | a2a2 |
| 2282 | 0–1, R | a1a1 | 1, R | a2a2 |
| 2286 | 1–2, R | a1a1 | 1–2, R | a2a2 |
| 2296 | 0–1, R | a1a1 | 1–2, R | a2b2 |
| 2300 | 1, R | a1a1 | 1–2, R | a2a2 |
| KWS2320 | 0–1, R | a1a1 | 0–1, R | a2a2 |
Notes:
Comparison of disease scores for Fusarium oxysporum Sch., isolate No. 5 symptoms in sugar beet breeding lines, showing resistant, R (0 or 1), intermediate, In (2) and susceptible, S (3 or 4) scores, identified after inoculation in the laboratory (A) and growth in a field trial (B). Genotyping of BvSP2 and BvSE2 was made according to the majority of identified alleles, BvSP2-a1a1; -a1b1; -b1b1; and BvSE2-a2a2; -a2b2; b2b2. Mixed phenotyping scores of 1–2 or 2–3 in the laboratory and field trial were designated as resistant and susceptible genotypes, respectively. The number of plants in the laboratory test and field trial were n = 10 and n = 40, respectively, while (n = 8) plants were used for genotyping. All experiments were conducted twice. Significant differences between pairwise comparisons according to the Mann–Whitney U-test (P < 0.05) are shown in bold and marked with an asterisk (*). Other data showed no significant differences in pairwise comparisons using the same U-test.