Table 2. FBD of five methods on three tomato plant image sets.
| FBD (for plant, %) | BP | SLIC-OTSU | Co-segmentation | Dense-CRF | MSBS-LDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CM1 | 97.90 | 98.50 | 93.00 | 92.76 | 98.08 |
| CM2 | 97.83 | 97.65 | 89.44 | 80.65 | 97.54 |
| CM3 | 97.31 | 97.12 | 82.04 | 90.47 | 98.02 |
| SQ1 | 96.32 | 96.03 | 92.44 | 85.78 | 96.42 |
| SQ2 | 97.07 | 96.93 | 88.99 | 92.63 | 97.44 |
| SQ3 | 98.80 | 99.13 | 97.15 | 96.18 | 99.18 |
| JD1 | 89.17 | 86.65 | 89.07 | 88.85 | 90.78 |
| JD2 | 94.00 | 92.02 | 92.89 | 92.62 | 94.31 |
| JD3 | 84.93 | 90.82 | 84.31 | 72.19 | 96.54 |