Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 28;6:e5036. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5036

Table 2. FBD of five methods on three tomato plant image sets.

FBD (for plant, %) BP SLIC-OTSU Co-segmentation Dense-CRF MSBS-LDA
CM1 97.90 98.50 93.00 92.76 98.08
CM2 97.83 97.65 89.44 80.65 97.54
CM3 97.31 97.12 82.04 90.47 98.02
SQ1 96.32 96.03 92.44 85.78 96.42
SQ2 97.07 96.93 88.99 92.63 97.44
SQ3 98.80 99.13 97.15 96.18 99.18
JD1 89.17 86.65 89.07 88.85 90.78
JD2 94.00 92.02 92.89 92.62 94.31
JD3 84.93 90.82 84.31 72.19 96.54