Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018 May 18;44(8):1638–1653. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.04.011

Table 1.

The tracking ROI size, average MCCC obtained, and computation times for the 2D and 3D RGMT methods for each of the five subjects included in this study and for three volume pairs for each subject. The standard deviations in MCCC and computation time represent the variation among three volume pairs among each of the five subjects.

Subject Number 1 2 3 4 5
ROI Size (cm3) for 2D and 3D RGMT 2.0×3.3×1.5 1.7×3.6×1.6 1.9×5.8×1.1 2.2×4.8×1.4 2.1×4.6×1.8
MCCC for 2D RGMT 0.71±0.08 0.80±0.04 0.79±0.02 0.72±0.16 0.87±0.06
MCCC for 3D RGMT 0.79±0.03 0.87± 0.03 0.83±0.03 0.87±0.03 0.90±0.03
Execution time (min) for 2D RGMT 10.2±0.4 7.8±0.4 9.1±0.5 11.4±0.7 12.1±1.0
Execution time (min) for 3D RGMT 27.7±1.5 18.8±1.1 22.2±0.6 35.7±0.3 36.1±1.7