Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 4;75(5):505–513. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0180

Table 2. Tests of Fixed Effects for Longitudinal Fractional Anisotropy Analysesa.

Dependent Variable Age Diagnostic Group Age × Group Decrease, %c
F Score P Value F Score P Value q Valueb β (SE) F Score P Value
Left ALIC 224.18 <.001 13.68 <.001 .002 −.028 (.007) 0.14 .71 −6.25
Right ALIC 190.82 <.001 7.97 .008 .01 −.021 (.008) 0.74 .39 −6.69
Left PLIC 225.12 <.001 3.61 .06 .09 −.015 (.008) 0.01 .91 −3.01
Right PLIC 187.69 <.001 2.82 .10 .12 −.014 (.008) 0.11 .74 −3.42
Left ATR 172.07 <.001 4.36 .04 .06 −.018 (.008) 0.80 .37 −2.58
Right ATR 157.54 <.001 2.60 .11 .13 −.014 (.009) 0.01 .94 −3.18
Left ILF 276.87 <.001 16.90 <.001 .001 −.029 (.007) 0.03 .87 −7.44
Right ILF 524.64 <.001 19.87 <.001 .001 −.028 (.006) 1.69 .20 −5.14
Left uncinate 255.94 <.001 10.85 .002 .005 −.019 (.006) 0.68 .41 −3.84
Right uncinate 278.16 <.001 9.53 .004 .008 −.016 (.005) 0.58 .45 −3.45
Left SCP 129.13 <.001 15.48 <.001 .002 −.029 (.007) 0.27 .60 −6.91
Right SCP 162.09 <.001 24.00 <.001 .001 −.038 (.008) 1.13 .29 −7.92
MCP 137.01 <.001 3.31 .07 .09 −.020 (.011) 0.03 .85 −3.76
Corpus callosum
Section I 510.48 <.001 19.98 <.001 .001 −.035 (.008) 0.17 .68 −7.59
Section II 471.95 <.001 14.75 <.001 .002 −.032 (.008) 0.18 .67 −6.96
Section III 333.09 <.001 6.42 .01 .02 −.025 (.010) 1.61 .21 −7.77
Section IV 153.25 <.001 2.23 .14 .15 −.016 (.010) 2.54 .12 −6.73
Section Va 231.19 <.001 5.62 .02 .03 −.020 (.008) 0.34 .56 −5.62
Section Vb 154.42 <.001 1.18 .28 .28 −.013 (.012) 0.75 .39 −4.20

Abbreviations: ALIC, anterior limb of internal capsule; ATR, anterior thalamic radiation; ILF, inferior longitudinal fasciculus; MCP, midcerebellar peduncle; PLIC, posterior limb of internal capsule; SCP, superior cerebellar peduncle.

a

Clinical site included as a model covariate.

b

The q Values are false discovery rate–corrected P values.

c

Percentage decrease compares least squares means in fractional anisotropy across all time points in patients with fragile X syndrome compared with controls.