Skip to main content
. 2018 May 21;12(7):1125–1137. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12315

Table 2.

Multivariable Cox regression analysis of RFS in HCC patients in the training, testing, and entire sets

Characteristic Multivariable analysis
HR 95% CI of HR P‐value
Training set (n = 153)
Risk score 1.623 1.346–1.966 < 0.0001
Sex, female/male 1.008 0.625–1.625 0.974
Age (years), ≥ 65/< 65 0.767 0.4634–1.271 0.304
Tumor stage, III.IV/I.II 15.280 1.579–147.89 0.019
Tumor grade, III.IV/I.II 0.897 0.552–1.457 0.660
T stage, T3.T4/T1.T2 0.124 0.013–1.178 0.069
N stage, non‐N0/N0 1.665 0.906–3.059 0.101
M stage, non‐M0/M0 0.952 0.505–1.792 0.878
Testing set (n = 153)
Risk score 1.378 1.101–1.701 0.004
Sex, female/male 0.580 0.333–1.011 0.055
Age (years), ≥ 65/< 65 1.211 0.721–2.033 0.470
Tumor stage, III.IV/I.II 1.330 0.158–11.21 0.793
Tumor grade, III.IV/I.II 1.362 0.826–2.240 0.227
T stage, T3.T4/T1.T2 2.468 0.211–16.073 0.581
N stage, non‐N0/N0 0.843 0.376–1.582 0.479
M stage, non‐M0/M0 1.022 0.631–2.298 0.574
Entire set (n = 306)
Risk score 1.484 1.298–1.696 < 0.0001
Sex, female/male 0.739 0.514–1.061 0.101
Age, years, ≥ 65/< 65 0.916 0.647–1.296 0.621
Tumor stage, III.IV/I.II 1.625 0.374–7.061 0.517
Tumor grade, III.IV/I.II 1.074 0.766–1.504 0.680
T stage, T3.T4/T1.T2 1.230 0.278–5.441 0.785
N stage, non‐N0/N0 1.028 0.661–1.598 0.904
M stage, non‐M0/M0 1.239 0.803–1.910 0.332

Tumor grade: neoplasm histologic grade; Tumor stage: AJCC pathological stage; T stage: tumor size; N stage: lymph node involvement; M stage: metastasis status. Values in bold indicate they are statistically different.