Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 25;10:193. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00193

Table 2.

Stepwise testing of linear mixed models including CSF biomarkers to predict cognitive test performance.

Outcome Model n Age Gender Education Tau *age
AVLT Immediate Model 1 623 −0.44 ± 0.06*** −5.63 ± 0.73*** 0.41 ± 0.11***
Model 2 623 −0.43 ± 0.06*** −5.64 ± 0.73*** 0.40 ± 0.11*** −0.99 ± 0.82
Model 3 318 −0.38 ± 0.08** −5.62 ± 1.09*** 0.92 ± 0.19*** −0.26 ± 1.08 −0.74 ± 1.43
Model 4 318 −0.54 ± 0.11*** −5.67 ± 1.08*** 0.91 ± 0.19*** 20.51 ± 10.53* −0.33 ± 1.44 −0.29 ± 0.14*
AVLT delayed Model 1 621 −0.12 ± 0.02*** −1.49 ± 0.26*** 0.07 ± 0.04
Model 2 621 −0.12 ± 0.02*** −1.49 ± 0.26*** 0.07 ± 0.04 −0.41 ± 0.30
Model 3 317 −0.14 ± 0.03** −1.09 ± 0.42* 0.17 ± 0.08* −0.27 ± 0.41 −0.61 ± 0.55
Model 4 317 −0.20 ± 0.04*** −1.10 ± 0.41** 0.16 ± 0.07* 8.87 ± 4.08* −0.43 ± 0.55 −0.13 ± 0.06*
VFT Model 1 716 −0.16 ± 0.03*** −0.20 ± 0.41 0.36 ± 0.06***
Model 2 716 −0.16 ± 0.03*** −0.18 ± 0.41 0.35 ± 0.06*** 0.41 ± 0.48
Model 3 414 −0.20 ± 0.04*** −0.07 ± 0.53 0.39 ± 0.08*** 0.60 ± 0.56 −0.50 ± 0.75
TMT-A Model 1 904 0.69 ± 0.06*** 0.81 ± 0.85 −0.71 ± 0.12***
Model 2 904 0.67 ± 0.06*** 0.89 ± 0.85 −0.70 ± 0.12*** 2.25 ± 1.01**
Model 3 567 0.61 ± 0.08*** −0.50 ± 1.08 −0.75 ± 0.17*** 3.53 ± 1.21** −0.73 ± 1.63
TMT-B Model 1 898 1.70 ± 0.16*** 2.27 ± 2.22 −2.20 ± 0.32***
Model 2 898 1.63 ± 0.16*** 2.52 ± 2.21 −2.17 ± 0.32*** 7.47 ± 2.61**
Model 3 563 1.48 ± 0.20*** −0.66 ± 2.77 −2.16 ± 0.43*** 10.24 ± 3.11** −2.38 ± 3.11
Model 4 563 1.97 ± 0.30*** −0.71 ± 2.77 −2.16 ± 0.43*** −38.73 ± 22.74 −3.39 ± 4.17 0.70 ± 0.32*

Numbers are mixed model coefficients ± standard error.

*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01,

***

p < 0.001. Model 4 was only added when any of the two-way interactions were significant. Aβ, amyloid-beta; AVLT, Auditory Verbal Learning Test; TMT-A, Trail Making Test part A; TMT-B, Trail Making Test part B; VFT, verbal fluency test.