Table 2.
Agent | Study (author, year) | Study design | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
SYSTEMIC APPLICATION ROUTE | |||
Actoxumab (CDA1) | Wilcox et al., 2017 |
Clinical Phase III study MODIFY I: |
|
Addition of actoxumab, bezlotoxumab, a-b or placebo to SoC treatment in adult (r)CDI patients | Higher mortality and more AE in actoxumab group; evaluation terminated | ||
Bezlotoxumab (MDX1388) | Wilcox et al., 2017 |
Clinical Phase III study Addition of bezlotoxumab (n = 781) vs. placebo (n = 773) to SoC treatment in adult (r)CDI patients |
|
MODIFY I | No difference initial cure rate (77% vs. 83%) Significant lower rCDI (17% vs. 28%) |
||
MODIFY II | No difference initial cure rate (83% vs. 78%) Significant lower rCDI (16% vs. 26%) |
||
Actoxumab-bezlotoxumab | Lowy et al., 2010 | Clinical Phase II studyAddition of CDA1+ and MDX1388 in single infusion (n = 101) vs. placebo (n = 99) to SoC treatment for CDI | Significant lower laboratory-documented rCDI: 7% comparator vs. 25% placebo |
Wilcox et al., 2017 |
Clinical phase III study Addition of actoxumab-bezlotoxumab (n = 773) vs. placebo (n = 773) to SoC treatment in adult (r)CDI patients |
||
MODIFY I | No difference initial cure rate (75% vs. 83%) Significant lower rCDI(16% vs. 28%) |
||
MODIFY II | No difference initial cure rate (72% vs. 78%) Significant lower rCDI (15% vs. 26%) |
||
IVIG | Leung et al., 1991 | Case series5 pediatric patients with hypoglobulinaemia and rCDI, 400 mg/kg IVIG | All patients had full resolution of symptoms |
Wilcox, 2004; McPherson et al., 2006; Negm et al., 2017 |
Retrospective studies 36 adult patients with (r)CDI, 150–500 mg/kg IVIG |
24 patients showed therapeutic response, 12 did not respond | |
Juang et al., 2007; Shahani and Koirala, 2015 |
Retrospective studies 39 adult patients with severe CDI, 82 control patients, 400 mg/kg IVIG |
No significant differences regarding outcome and severity of symptoms | |
ORAL APPLICATION ROUTE | |||
IgAbulin | Tjellström et al., 1993 |
Case study 1 pediatric patient with severe CDI |
Full resolution of symptoms |
MucoMilk | van Dissel et al., 2005 |
Prospective cohort study 15 adult patients, 1 pediatric patient with completed antibiotic therapy, under which 9 patients with rCDI |
No relapse within a median follow-up period of 333 days |
Numan et al., 2007 |
Prospective cohort study 101 adult patients, with completed antibiotic therapy, 61 patients with CDI 40 patients with rCDI (40%) |
Prevention of relapse by 50% during a follow up period of 60 days | |
Cediff | Mattila et al., 2008 |
Prospective study 38 adult patients with rCDI 20 were treated with Cediff, 18 were treated with metronidazole |
Cediff was as effective as metronidazole in the prevention of CDI recurrences during a 70 day follow up (sustained recovery 56% vs. 55%) |
a-b, actoxumab-bezlotoxumab; AE, adverse event; SOC, standard-of-care; CDI, C. difficile disease; CDA1, human monoclonal anti-toxin A; CDB1, human monoclonal anti-toxin B; rCDI, recurrent CDI; SoC, standard-of-care antibiotic treatment for CDI; TcdA, C. difficile toxin A; TcdB, C. difficile toxin B; vs., versus; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin.