Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 5;9(6):283. doi: 10.3390/genes9060283

Table 1.

Advantages and disadvantages of different methods based on microfluidics used to fabricate liposomes.

Method Advantages Disadvantages Liposomes Diameter Reference
Electroformation Simple and rapid Large size polydisperisity, inapplicable to ionic solutions, low encapsulation efficiency 5–150 μm [24,25]
Hydration Electric fields are unnecessary Large size polydisperisity, products are multilamellar;
sensitive to phospholipid type and physical conditions, low encapsulation efficiency
1–10 μm [24]
Extrusion Reduced size polydispersity Relatively complex in operation 130–370 nm [28]
Microfluidic jetting Products are unilamellar and of controlled size, encapsulation efficiencies are high Specialized equipment needed, sensitivity to operational parameters and types of materials used Above 100 μm [29]
Microfluidic hydrodynamic-focusing Products are monodisperse, the size and lamellarity of liposomes are easily controlled, high-throughput production Low liposome concentration in the end-product 50–300 nm [30]
Droplet emulsion templates Polymerosomes can be generated, the size and structure of products can be controlled, high encapsulation efficiencies Solvent may reside between monolayers 20–200 μm [31]