Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 13;8(6):429. doi: 10.3390/nano8060429

Table 3.

Comparison of electroanalytical parameters for the determination of glucose at CuNPs/NGO nanocomposite modified electrode with previously reported modified electrodes.

Modified Electrode a LR (μM) b LOD (μM) Sensitivity Ref.
3D N-Co-CNT@NG) 25–10,830 0.1 9.05 µA mM−1 cm−2 [40]
Cu@porous carbon 1–6000 0.6 10,100 [41]
[Cu3(c btc)2] nanocube 1–2250 1 549 µA mM−1 cm−2 [42]
Cu-d BDD 1–50 10 2.3 µA mM−1 cm−2 [43]
N-doped Carbon-Cu nanohybrids 5–2100 0.7 223.6 µA mM−1 cm−2 [44]
Graphene oxide and NiO nanofibers 2–600 0.77 1100 [45]
Cu nanoporous 10–500 40 220 µA mM−1 cm−2 [46]
Cu NPs/SWCNTs 0.5–500 0.3 0.256 µA mM−1 cm−2 [47]
Cu/CuO/ZnO 100–1000 18 408 µA mM−1 cm−2 [48]
AuCu/CNTs 80–9260 4 22 µA mM−1 cm−2 [49]
CuNPs/NGO 1–1803 0.44 2500 µA mM−1 cm−2 This work

a LR—linear range, b LOD—limits of detection, c btc—Benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate, d BDD—boron doped diamond electrode.