Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 2.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2016 Sep 27;24(5):555–574. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2016.1227423

Table 2.

Inferential statistics for the normative ratings of the picture stimuli used in both experiments.

Comparison Arousal Valence
High-arousal positive Low-arousal positive t = 9.6, d = 1.8* t = 1.3, p = .20, d = .24
Low-arousal neutral t = 6.2, d = 1.1* t = 6.3, d = 1.1*
High-arousal neutral t = 1.0, p = .30, d = .19 t = 8.8, d = 1.6*
Low-arousal positive Low-arousal neutral t = 1.2, p = .25, d = .21 t = 7.3, d = 1.3*
High-arousal neutral t = 8.4, d = 1.5* t = 9.8, d = 1.8*
High-arousal neutral Low-arousal neutral t = 5.3, d = .97* t = 1.2, p = .25, d = .21

For every analysis, df = 118. Means and standard errors for each picture type are provided in Table 1. High-arousal neutral pictures were not used in Experiment 1.

*

p < .001.