Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 13;12(4):426–432. doi: 10.5009/gnl17403

Table 2.

Responses from Korean Doctors on Postpolypectomy Follow-up Surveillance Recommendations in Comparison to Guideline Recommendations

Clinical scenario Recommendation in Korean guidelines, yr Responses on follow-up surveillance intervals

6 mo 1 yr 3 yr 5 yr 10 yr No repetition
6-mm Hyperplastic polyp 5* 1 (0.2) 33 (7.0) 124 (28.9) 210 (61.1) 9 (2.7) 1 (0.2)
6-mm TA 5 4 (0.7) 117 (26.9) 182 (48.6) 71 (23.5) 1 (0.3) 0
12-mm TA with HGD 3 163 (34.1) 168 (49.4) 44 (15.8) 2 (0.7) 0 0
12-mm TVA 3 99 (20.2) 191 (48.4) 84 (30.3) 3 (1.0) 0 0
Two 6-mm TAs 5 13 (2.2) 150 (31.8) 157 (47.3) 55 (18.3) 1 (0.4) 0
No polyps in a patient with a 12-mm TA 3 yr earlier 5* 2 (0.4) 18 (3.2) 159 (41.4) 196 (52.9) 3 (2.1) 0

Data are presented as unweighted numbers (weighted proportions). Non-respondents to each question were excluded.

TA, tubular adenoma; HGD, high-grade dysplasia; TVA, tubulovillous adenoma.

*

The U.S. Multi-Society Task Force recommends an interval of 10 years; the European panel (EPAGE II) recommends 5.5 years;

The U.S. Multi-Society Task Force recommends an interval of 5–10 years; the European panel (EPAGE II) recommends 5 years.