Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurogenet. 2016 Nov 15;30(3-4):195–204. doi: 10.1080/01677063.2016.1252764

Table 3. Gene ontology annotations for miR-6 targets.

Annotation cluster Enrichment score GO Term: Biological Function Gene Count % of total P-Value FE BS FDR
1 3.84 instar larval or pupal morphogenesis 23 6.42 0.00 2.62 0.00 0.10
2 3.63 neuron projection morphogenesis 20 5.59 0.00 2.76 0.00 0.17
3 3.46 post-embryonic organ morphogenesis 19 5.31 0.00 2.64 0.01 0.47
4 2.93 imaginal disc-derived appendage morphogenesis 16 4.47 0.00 2.64 0.02 1.66
5 2.39 imaginal disc-derived wing morphogenesis 14 3.91 0.00 2.54 0.05 5.43
6 1.66 negative regulation of transcription 12 3.35 0.02 2.29 0.16 22.50
7 1.54 negative regulation of macromolecule biosynthetic process 13 3.63 0.02 2.09 0.21 30.00
8 1.50 leg segmentation 4 1.12 0.01 9.29 0.10 12.63
9 1.37 response to other organism 9 2.51 0.02 2.73 0.17 24.13
10 1.35 cell migration 10 2.79 0.03 2.26 0.26 41.86

Significant biological function categories were clustered based on enrichment scores using DAVID. The top term in each of the top-10 cluster is listed. The ‘Gene Count’ column displays number of genes in each cluster associated with a particular GO term, as well as the % of the total number of genes in the cluster is shown. P-value, Fold Enrichment (FE), Benjamini Score (BS) and False Discovery Rate (FDR) are also shown.